2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1089961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugarcane stem node detection and localization for cutting using deep learning

Abstract: IntroductionIn order to promote sugarcane pre-cut seed good seed and good method planting technology, we combine the development of sugarcane pre-cut seed intelligent 0p99oposeed cutting machine to realize the accurate and fast identification and cutting of sugarcane stem nodes.MethodsIn this paper, we proposed an algorithm to improve YOLOv4-Tiny for sugarcane stem node recognition. Based on the original YOLOv4-Tiny network, the three maximum pooling layers of the original YOLOv4-tiny network were replaced wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [ 24 ] introduced the YOLOv4 algorithm to study the recognition of sugarcane stem nodes in a natural environment and realize fast and accurate recognition of sugarcane stem nodes in a complex natural environment. Wang et al [ 25 ] proposed an algorithm aimed at enhancing YOLOv4-Tiny for sugarcane stem node recognition. This improved algorithm achieved remarkable results, including a mean accuracy precision of 99.11%, a detection accuracy of 97.07%, and a transmission frame per second (fps) rate of 30.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [ 24 ] introduced the YOLOv4 algorithm to study the recognition of sugarcane stem nodes in a natural environment and realize fast and accurate recognition of sugarcane stem nodes in a complex natural environment. Wang et al [ 25 ] proposed an algorithm aimed at enhancing YOLOv4-Tiny for sugarcane stem node recognition. This improved algorithm achieved remarkable results, including a mean accuracy precision of 99.11%, a detection accuracy of 97.07%, and a transmission frame per second (fps) rate of 30.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low speeds impair operational performance and machines designed to harvest satisfactorily well above 3 km h −1 . Wang et al [6] showed that cut quality is a severe problem in sugarcane seed production. In this way, they applied machine learning to improve operation; this application can also improve the base cut harvesting operation, opening perspectives for future investigations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanized sugarcane harvesting brought several environmental benefits, reducing the need for labor and fires [1] and increasing agricultural performance [2]. However, mechanized harvesting also generates problems, such as increased raw impurities, field losses [3], lower cut quality [4][5][6][7] and ratoons with damage [8], resulting in fragmented stumps [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [27] studied the impact of data augmentation and varying lighting conditions on detecting sugarcane stem nodes, identifying YOLO v4 as the top performer with an average precision of 95.17%, compared to Faster R-CNN (78.87%), SSD300 (88.98%), RetinaNet (90.88%), and YOLO v3 (92.69%). Wang et al [28] improved an algorithm, resulting in a mean average precision (MAP) of 99.11% and a detection accuracy of 97.07%, surpassing the Faster-RCNN and YOLOv4 algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%