1981
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(81)90082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suggestions for slope stability calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods assume that the soil is incompressible and that its properties are homogeneous and isotropic [Chen, 1975]. These methods have been adapted from their original formulations to allow a sloping ground surface and cohesive soil by Chugh and Smart [1981], in the Coulomb case, and by Soubra and Macuh [2002], in the log-spiral case.…”
Section: A Three-dimensional Slope Stability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods assume that the soil is incompressible and that its properties are homogeneous and isotropic [Chen, 1975]. These methods have been adapted from their original formulations to allow a sloping ground surface and cohesive soil by Chugh and Smart [1981], in the Coulomb case, and by Soubra and Macuh [2002], in the log-spiral case.…”
Section: A Three-dimensional Slope Stability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their slope‐parallel component acts as a driving or resisting force on the margin, while their slope‐normal component modifies the resisting force on the base. The active force on the upslope margin of the group of columns is calculated from vertical stress using the Coulomb active earth pressure coefficient ( K a ), which assumes a planar failure surface [ Chugh and Smart , ]. The passive force on the downslope margin is calculated using the Log‐Spiral passive earth pressure coefficient ( K p ), which accounts for the curvature of the failure surface that develops on this margin [ Soubra and Macuh , ].…”
Section: Slope Stability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is 58 fast and allows the field or emergency engineer to make timely decisions. Although this 59 methodology is only available in some current software (Slide V 5.0, STB 2010, Geo-Slope), and 60 based on limit equilibrium methods, it is highly recommended because of its reliability for 61 representing real conditions in the field [Chugh, 1981]. While these software programmes can 62 reproduce the actual water table, they cannot reproduce the effect of matrix suction caused 63 by rain infiltration [Herrada et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introduction 33mentioning
confidence: 99%