Suicide Prevention Program Rating Profile

Eckert, Tanya L.; Miller, David N.; DuPaul, George J.; Scherff, Andrew R.

doi:10.1037/t14763-000

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The acceptability of screening was assessed using the Suicide Prevention Program Rating Profile (SPPRP; Eckert, Miller, DuPaul, & Scherff, 2004). The SPPRP is a 14-item scale designed to assess school consumers’ perceptions of the acceptability and intrusiveness of suicide-prevention programs.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Higher scores on the SPPRP indicate a greater degree of Acceptability, less Intrusiveness and fewer Time Demands. The SPPRP has demonstrated reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.90) and validity (Eckert et al, 2004). For the current study three versions of the questionnaire were developed with the wording modified slightly in each, in order to be appropriate for students, parents, and school staff.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does Screening High School Students for Psychological Distress, Deliberate Self-Harm, or Suicidal Ideation Cause Distress – And Is It Acceptable?

Robinson

Yuen

Martin

et al. 2011

Crisis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Screening High School Students for Psychological Distress, Deliberate Self-Harm, or Suicidal Ideation Cause Distress – And Is It Acceptable?

Robinson

Yuen

Martin

et al. 2011

Crisis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Youth Suicide Prevention: A Survey of Public School Superintendents' Acceptability of School‐Based Programs

Scherff

Eckert

Miller

2005

Suicide & Life Threat Behav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From a random sample of members of the 2000-2001 membership directory of the American Association of School Administrators (AASA), public school administrators' acceptability ratings of three school-based programs for the prevention of adolescent suicide were examined. A total of 210 (46%) respondents examined a description of a suicide prevention program and completed a measure designed to evaluate the acceptability of suicide prevention programs. Three suicide prevention programs were evaluated for their acceptability, and included: (a) school-wide curriculum-based programs presented to students; (b) in-service presentations to school staff; and (c) self-report screening programs for students. The results indicated that superintendents rated the staff in-service training and curriculum-based programs as significantly more acceptable than the school-wide screening program. In addition, the school-wide screening program was rated as significantly more intrusive by school psychologists than the staff in-service training or curriculum-based prevention programs. Limitations of the study and future research directions are discussed.

show abstract

Suicide Prevention Program Rating Profile

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Does Screening High School Students for Psychological Distress, Deliberate Self-Harm, or Suicidal Ideation Cause Distress – And Is It Acceptable?

Does Screening High School Students for Psychological Distress, Deliberate Self-Harm, or Suicidal Ideation Cause Distress – And Is It Acceptable?

Youth Suicide Prevention: A Survey of Public School Superintendents' Acceptability of School‐Based Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About