2002
DOI: 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0614:sramis]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate Reduction and Methanogenesis in Sediments of Mtoni Mangrove Forest, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…are limited by sulfate availability (18,19). This hypothesis is strongly supported by the observation that, for a field survey across North America and Europe, the rate of sulfate reduction in peatland soils increases with increasing sulfate deposition up to a rate of 15-20 kg SO 4 2Ϫ -S ha Ϫ1 ⅐yr Ϫ1 (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are limited by sulfate availability (18,19). This hypothesis is strongly supported by the observation that, for a field survey across North America and Europe, the rate of sulfate reduction in peatland soils increases with increasing sulfate deposition up to a rate of 15-20 kg SO 4 2Ϫ -S ha Ϫ1 ⅐yr Ϫ1 (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In wetlands, however, the balance between sulfate reduction and methanogenesis is affected by factors such as the temperature [warmer temperatures favor methanogenesis (15)], the rate of SO 4 2Ϫ and acetate supply [lower concentrations of sulfate or higher concentrations of acetate reduce the intensity of competition (13)], and the availability of noncompetitive substrates [some low molecular weight hydrocarbons may be preferentially used over acetate by SRB (16,17) and some substrates such as methanol, methanethiol, and dimethyl sulfide may be used by MA but are poorly used by SRB (18,19)]. As a consequence, sulfate reduction in wetlands partially, rather than completely, inhibits methane production (19). Stimulation of sulfate reduction has been exploited as a mechanism to reduce GHG emissions from rice paddies; in field trials, CH 4 emissions have been reduced by as much as 72% with doses of gypsum (CaSO 4 ) ranging from several hundred to thousands of kilograms of SO 4 2Ϫ per hectare (ha) (20,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zinder and Brock (1978d) were the first to report the anaerobic conversion of DMS and MeSH to C0 2 and CH 4 in freshwater lake sediments and sewage sludge. Since then, this process has been reported to occur in many anoxic environments including salt marsh and mangrove sediments, hypersaline lakes, and a variety of freshwater sediments (Jonkers et al, 2000;Kiene, 1988;Kiene et al, 1986;Lomans et al, 1999aLomans et al, , 2001bLyimo et al, 2000Lyimo et al, , 2002. Degradation of DMS and MeSH in anaerobic environments is catalyzed primarily by methanogenic, SO|~-reducing, NO^-reducing, and phototrophic bacteria (Kiene, 1988(Kiene, , 1991aKiene et al, 1986;Liu et al, 1990;Lomans et al, 2002b;Lyimo et al, 2000;Oremland et al, 1989;Tanimoto and Bak, 1994;Visscher et al, 1995;Zeyer et al, 1987).…”
Section: Methylsulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction are important processes responsible for the terminal electron removal during decomposition of organic matter in anaerobic environments. A novel obligately methylotrophic methanogenic bacteria, Methanosarcina semesiae MD1 (T), has been isolated from Tanzania's mangrove sediments and identified by analyzing the 16S region of the rRNA; and sediments' organic matter contents, bacterial numbers, methane emission, sulphide concentration and redox potential profiles have been studied (Lyimo et al, 2000(Lyimo et al, , 2002a(Lyimo et al, , 2002b. The sediments are characterized as having high organic matter content and bacterial numbers.…”
Section: Nitrogen Fixation Sulphur Reduction and Methanogenesis In Mmentioning
confidence: 99%