2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate reduction rates in the sediments of the Mediterranean continental shelf inferred from combined dissolved inorganic carbon and total alkalinity profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since marine methane flux settings have diagenetic systems different than sites without methane fluxes (e.g., Formolo and Lyons, 2013), the sulfide burial rate at diffusive methane flux settings could differ from the global average (Dickens, 2011). For example, nearly quantitative precipitation of all reduced sulfur by AOM was reported for an iron-rich, non-steady-state setting (Hensen et al, 2003) and more recently, and two thirds of sulfide produced via AOM and OSR at the SMTZ was inferred to undergo burial (Wurgaft et al, 2019). Availability of reactive iron (for sulfide burial) as well as the ratio of burial versus oxidation of the sulfide produced at the SMTZ is thus an important parameter in determining the impact of methane induced carbon cycling at diffusive methane flux settings.…”
Section: Importance Of Dic Outflux To the Water Column: Implication Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since marine methane flux settings have diagenetic systems different than sites without methane fluxes (e.g., Formolo and Lyons, 2013), the sulfide burial rate at diffusive methane flux settings could differ from the global average (Dickens, 2011). For example, nearly quantitative precipitation of all reduced sulfur by AOM was reported for an iron-rich, non-steady-state setting (Hensen et al, 2003) and more recently, and two thirds of sulfide produced via AOM and OSR at the SMTZ was inferred to undergo burial (Wurgaft et al, 2019). Availability of reactive iron (for sulfide burial) as well as the ratio of burial versus oxidation of the sulfide produced at the SMTZ is thus an important parameter in determining the impact of methane induced carbon cycling at diffusive methane flux settings.…”
Section: Importance Of Dic Outflux To the Water Column: Implication Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most abundant clay mineral is montmorillonite (with a smaller fraction of illite and kaolinite), which makes silica, alumina, and ferric iron oxides the main chemical components in the bulk sediment (Nir, 1984). Although methane is not expected in the upper several meters of the sediments due to the oligotrophic characteristics the SE Mediterranean Sea surface water, methane was observed in several cores collected from SG-1 (Sela-Adler et al, 2015;Vigderovich et al, 2019;Wurgaft et al, 2019). They identified the SMTZ in the upper few meters of the sediments, conducted an isotopic analysis of the methane and concluded that most of the methane is from biogenic source and that it is being produced in situ.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four samples, collected from different depths, show an identical composition. Wurgaft et al (2019) determined the content of calcite, clays, and quartz, in a different core collected from the same station, by 4-6%, 50-70%, and 15-25%, respectively. Measurements of iron fractions using chemical extractions ( Figure 2D) show that goethite, hematite and akageneite (Fe ox2 ) are the most abundant Fe minerals in the sediment, with concentrations of 2.2% wt/dry sediment at the top of the sediment, decreasing to 1.4% wt/dry sediment at 500 cm depth.…”
Section: Sediment Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron-coupled AOM in natural lake sediments was indicated using isotope porewater depth profiles (Sivan et al, 2011), rate modeling based on these profiles (Adler et al, 2011), microbial profiles (Bar-Or et al, 2015) and directly from a set of sediment slurry incubation experiments (Bar-Or et al, 2017). The few microbial studies on iron-coupled AOM (mainly in cultures) showed either the involvement of methanogenic/methanotrophic archaea (Scheller et al, 2016;Ettwig et al, 2016;Rotaru and Thamdrup, 2016;Cai et al, 2018;Yan et al, 2018) or a cooperation between methanotrophs and methanogens (Bar-Or et al, 2017).…”
Section: Fe 3+mentioning
confidence: 99%