2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate removal from wastewater using ettringite precipitation: Magnesium ion inhibition and process optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, based on the literatures and experimental results [19,21], the following chemical equilibrium reactions can be used to describe the SO 4 2− removal reaction process:…”
Section: Removal Of Sulfate Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, based on the literatures and experimental results [19,21], the following chemical equilibrium reactions can be used to describe the SO 4 2− removal reaction process:…”
Section: Removal Of Sulfate Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons is that Ca(OH) 2 solubility decreased with the increase of solution pH, resulting in lower Ca 2+ concentration in the solution and less ettringite production. Another reason is that the amount of CO 2 absorbed by the solution increased with increasing alkalinity of the solution, resulting in an increase of CO 3 2− concentration in the solution; thus CO 3 2− can react with ettringite to form hydrated carbonated calcium aluminate (3CaO·Al 2 O 3 ·CaCO 3 ·11H 2 O) [19,23], leading to decrease in SO 4 2− removal e ciencies. erefore, it is necessary to control the wastewater pH in practical engineering applications in the range of 5.0∼9.0 to achieve a higher SO 4 2− removal.…”
Section: Removal Of Sulfate Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations