2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1598-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfide level in municipal sludge digesters affects microbial community response to long-chain fatty acid loads

Abstract: BackgroundWaste lipids are attractive substrates for co-digestion with primary and activated sewage sludge (PASS) to improve biogas production at wastewater treatment plants. However, slow conversion rates of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA), produced during anaerobic digestion (AD), limit the applicability of waste lipids as co-substrates for PASS. Previous observations indicate that the sulfide level in PASS digesters affects the capacity of microbial communities to convert LCFA to biogas. This study assessed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The syntrophic lifestyle of the species of Candidatus Cloacimonas was previously suggested based on identification of genes related to syntrophic propionate oxidation in the presence of hydrogen-utilizing microorganisms [ 49 ]. In addition, the occurrence of members of phylum Cloacimonetes (e.g., Cloacimonadales W27, Cloacidonadaceae W5 , and Candidatus Cloacimonas ) during anaerobic lipids and LCFA degradation in different anaerobic environments has been used as an argument for their potential involvement in lipid degradation [ 16 , 50 , 51 ], which is in line with our observation on the prevalence of Candidatus Cloacimonas in R2 following oleate pulse feeding. Nevertheless, Candidatus Cloacimonas had the lowest degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality among the bacteria in the co-occurrence network, suggesting that this genus had limited interactions with other microorganisms [ 35 ] and, therefore, its contribution to the integrity and functions of the microbial community is possibly marginal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The syntrophic lifestyle of the species of Candidatus Cloacimonas was previously suggested based on identification of genes related to syntrophic propionate oxidation in the presence of hydrogen-utilizing microorganisms [ 49 ]. In addition, the occurrence of members of phylum Cloacimonetes (e.g., Cloacimonadales W27, Cloacidonadaceae W5 , and Candidatus Cloacimonas ) during anaerobic lipids and LCFA degradation in different anaerobic environments has been used as an argument for their potential involvement in lipid degradation [ 16 , 50 , 51 ], which is in line with our observation on the prevalence of Candidatus Cloacimonas in R2 following oleate pulse feeding. Nevertheless, Candidatus Cloacimonas had the lowest degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality among the bacteria in the co-occurrence network, suggesting that this genus had limited interactions with other microorganisms [ 35 ] and, therefore, its contribution to the integrity and functions of the microbial community is possibly marginal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Bacterial community response to the oleate pulse feeding was different in R5, with effluent recirculation, where Smithella prevailed instead of Candidatus Cloacimonas as compared to R2. Smithella is able to oxidize fatty acids (e.g., propionate and butyrate), n -alkanes (e.g., C 9 –C 12 ), and an association of Smithella to LCFA conversion in PASS digesters has been reported [ 16 , 52 , 53 ]. Smithella is also able to dismutate propionate to butyrate and acetate, and it has low sensitivity to high hydrogen partial pressure, e.g., during syntrophic propionate oxidation [ 52 , 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These two primer sets have previously been shown to adapt well to Illumina sequencing. Moreover, the archaeal community generated from these two primer sets is generally consistent, but with higher resolution in the results for primer set 516F and 915R [44,61,108,109]. However, the results of these two primer sets were somewhat contradictory for sample 1A_204.…”
Section: Possible Bias Introduced By Using Two Different Primers Formentioning
confidence: 64%