2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2017.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur isotope analysis of carbonate-hosted Zn–Pb deposits in northwestern Guizhou Province, Southwest China: Implications for the source of reduced sulfur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The δ 34 S value of sulfides in the Maliping deposit ranges from 8.25 to 30.30‰, with an average of 15.58‰, which is lower than that of evaporites but very close to the S isotope fractionation caused by TSR. At the same time, the δ 34 S value is very close to the average δ 34 S value (generally 8-20‰) of most Pb-Zn deposits where reduced S is derived from the formation of seawater sulfate in the wall rock based on TSR [13,21,[61][62][63][64] in the SYGT (Figure 4b). Therefore, reduced S in the deposit is mainly derived from the formation of seawater sulfate in the Lower Cambrian Yuhucun Formation in the wall rock and the underlying Sinian Dengying Formation based on TSR.…”
Section: S Sourcesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The δ 34 S value of sulfides in the Maliping deposit ranges from 8.25 to 30.30‰, with an average of 15.58‰, which is lower than that of evaporites but very close to the S isotope fractionation caused by TSR. At the same time, the δ 34 S value is very close to the average δ 34 S value (generally 8-20‰) of most Pb-Zn deposits where reduced S is derived from the formation of seawater sulfate in the wall rock based on TSR [13,21,[61][62][63][64] in the SYGT (Figure 4b). Therefore, reduced S in the deposit is mainly derived from the formation of seawater sulfate in the Lower Cambrian Yuhucun Formation in the wall rock and the underlying Sinian Dengying Formation based on TSR.…”
Section: S Sourcesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The Youjiang foreland basin, located along the SE border of the SYGMB (Figure 1A), was uplifted into a fold belt during the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic [39,85,86]. The Pb-Zn mineralization ages for the SYGMB (such as c. 203 Ma yielded by Maoping sphalerite Rb-Sr isotope geochronology [48]) coincide with the wellconstrained episode of the evolution of the Youjiang foreland basin, suggesting basinal brines originating from the basin are related to the mineralization [24,48,87].…”
Section: A Genetic Model For the Maoping Depositmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During sulfide precipitation, there is no noticeable sulfur isotope fractionation between metal sulfides and reduced sulfur. In metallic deposits, the δ 34 S values of metal sulfides depend on the reduced S from the TSR and are typically 10% to 20% lower than the δ 34 S values of seawater sulfate in the surrounding rocks [2,42,[47][48][49]. At the Fuli Pb-Zn deposit, sulfide minerals including sphalerite, galena, and minor pyrite are present, but no sulfate minerals have been detected.…”
Section: Organic Matter and Tsr Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%