2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur passivation for the formation of Si-terminated Al2O3/SiGe(0 0 1) interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 The positive voltage shift could be due to the increase in fixed oxide and/or interface charge, and the shift scales linearly with the thickness of the dielectric layer. According to theory, a thicker dielectric layer will increase the absolute magnitude of the fixed oxide charge contribution to the flat band voltage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12 The positive voltage shift could be due to the increase in fixed oxide and/or interface charge, and the shift scales linearly with the thickness of the dielectric layer. According to theory, a thicker dielectric layer will increase the absolute magnitude of the fixed oxide charge contribution to the flat band voltage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work shows that (NH 4 ) 2 S solutions deposit 0.54 ML of S, but both Si and Ge oxides remain after treatment. 12 We investigated how the addition of acid to (NH 4 ) 2 S changes the S and O coverages. To complement the chemical characterization of the surface, we fabricated metal-insulator-semiconductor capacitor (MISCAP) devices to mimic the gate stack in a transistor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, several techniques such as nitride and sulfur passivation on Si 0.7 Ge 0.3 (001) were studied with Al 2 O 3 gate oxides and reduction in the interface defect density via suppression of GeO x formation was reported [10][11] . However similar low defect density interfaces could not be established with HfO 2 gate oxide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to 6×(9HfO 2 +1Al 2 O 3 ) NL gate dielectric structure, gate oxide without oxidant during Al 2 O 3 ALD is performed by only TMA dosing and D it reduction along with C max observed indicating Al 2 O 3 layer formation by oxygen scavenging. It is hypothesized that TMA exposure scavenges weakly bound oxygen from the interface either by diffusing into the interface as TMA or TMA reaction products (for example monomethyl aluminum) or it decomposes the GeO x remotely, producing suboxide species that diffuse readily through even thin Al 2 O 3 (remote gettering)10 . As TMA interacts and scavenges oxygen from the interface, it is likely that GeO x dissociates and donates oxygen to TMA due to the lower Gibbs free energy of formation of GeO x in comparison to SiO x 27.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%