2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2005.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulphur partitioning in sediments and biodeposits below mussel rafts in the Rı́a de Arousa (Galicia, NW Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mussel biodeposits are known to be rich in organic nitrogen, which may be used as a tracer of this type of enrichment in coastal systems (KASPAR et al, 1984;GRENZ et al, 1990). Lower values of C:N related to mussel biodeposits have also been reported by Chamberlain et al (2001), Hartstein and Rowden (2004), Otero et al (2006) and Bonetti et al (2006a). At Museu Beach, no significant differences in the C:N ratio were found between the station groups, but there were other sedimentological descriptors that presented some differences, including the poor sorting of grain sizes, higher skewness of grain distribution and the higher percentage of biodetritic carbonate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mussel biodeposits are known to be rich in organic nitrogen, which may be used as a tracer of this type of enrichment in coastal systems (KASPAR et al, 1984;GRENZ et al, 1990). Lower values of C:N related to mussel biodeposits have also been reported by Chamberlain et al (2001), Hartstein and Rowden (2004), Otero et al (2006) and Bonetti et al (2006a). At Museu Beach, no significant differences in the C:N ratio were found between the station groups, but there were other sedimentological descriptors that presented some differences, including the poor sorting of grain sizes, higher skewness of grain distribution and the higher percentage of biodetritic carbonate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, a slight elevation was observed in the oldest and shallowest sector of the Alto Ribeirão culture area, suggesting the formation of a local biodeposit layer. Pronounced saliencies under shellfish cultures due to the presence of a biodeposit layer have been reported in other regions with more intensive production (MATTSON; LINDÉN, 1983;OTERO et al, 2006). The Alto Ribeirão site has relatively shallow depths associated with weak hydrodynamics which, according to Jusup et al (2007), reduces the area of particle dispersion and favors biodeposition directly beneath culture operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rates of sulfate reduction can be stimulated by increased input of OM under aquaculture net-pens (Holmer & Kristensen 1992, Holmer & Frederiksen 2007) and the transition to more hypoxic conditions is also characterized by increased sediment oxygen consumption and sediment-water fluxes of dissolved nutrients (Hall et al 1990, 1992, Holby & Hall 1991, Hargrave et al 1993, Holmer et al 2002. Increased bacterial sulfate reduction and the accumulation of metabolic by-products that form both dissolved and particle-bound sulfides such as FeS 2 (pyrite) and other metal-S complexes are underlying causes for the increase in particulate sulfides associated with benthic OM enrichment (Howarth 1979, Berner 1984, Rickard & Morse 2005, Otero et al 2006. Particulate reduced sulfides (pyrite and other types of AVS) are in themselves not toxic to benthic fauna but oxygen consumption by these reduced compounds in surface sediments and direct toxic effects can lead to hypoxic stress on fauna (Theede 1973, Gray 1981, Rosenberg et al 1992, Nilsson & Rosenberg 2000, Gray et al 2002.…”
Section: Enrichment Effects On Benthic Quality and Biodiversity Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The good correlation observed between the biomarkers in both crabs and clams incubated under field conditions suggests that these locations suffer the stress of non-measured variables which, in the case of site D, could be related to the proximity of aquaculture infrastructures (mussel culture). Other authors (Otero et al, 2006), have described the negative impacts of these mussel aquaculture, including: the discharge of a large volume of biodeposits containing high concentrations of nutrients; the release of drugs and pesticides into the environment; an increase in sedimentation and accumulation of organic matter and an increase in the concentration of nutrients in sediments and waters (mainly N and P). Negative effects on wild populations of animals have also been observed, ranging from genetic interaction and disease transmission, to changes in the composition of the structure of benthic fauna due to a change from oxic to anoxic conditions (Otero et al, 2006).…”
Section: Factor #2mentioning
confidence: 99%