Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3018661.3018704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summarizing Answers in Non-Factoid Community Question-Answering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic summarization is the process of automatically generating a summary that retains the most important content of the original text document (Nenkova and McKeown, 2012). Traditionally, the summarization methods can be classified into three categories: extraction-based methods (Erkan and Radev, 2004;Goldstein et al, 2000;Wan et al, 2007;Min et al, 2012;Nallapati et al, 2017;Cheng and Lapata, 2016;Cao et al, 2016;Song et al, 2017), compression-based methods (Li et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Li et al, 2015, and abstraction-based methods. In fact, previous investigations show that human-written summaries are more abstractive (Barzilay and McKeown, 2005;.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic summarization is the process of automatically generating a summary that retains the most important content of the original text document (Nenkova and McKeown, 2012). Traditionally, the summarization methods can be classified into three categories: extraction-based methods (Erkan and Radev, 2004;Goldstein et al, 2000;Wan et al, 2007;Min et al, 2012;Nallapati et al, 2017;Cheng and Lapata, 2016;Cao et al, 2016;Song et al, 2017), compression-based methods (Li et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Li et al, 2015, and abstraction-based methods. In fact, previous investigations show that human-written summaries are more abstractive (Barzilay and McKeown, 2005;.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work discussed various features affecting the quality of asked question. Such analysis of features are useful for forums to help users in formulating improved question so as to retrieve most prompt information they are searching for.Zhao et al, [32] considered the problem of expert finding from the view point of learning ranking metric embedding. The ranking metric network learning framework has integrated users' relative quality rank to given questions and their social relations for expert identification.…”
Section: Community Question Answering Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a part of the survey, the study also highlighted current trends and the areasthat need to pave further attention from the research community. Song et al, [32] aimed at non-factoid question-answering that usually expects passages as answers. A sparse coding-based summarization strategy has been proposed that includes three core features: short document expansion, sentence vectorization, and a sparse-coding optimization framework.…”
Section: Community Question Answering Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mihalcea and Tarau (2004) and Erkan and Radev (2004a) estimated sentence salience by applying the PageRank algorithm to the sentence graph. He et al (2012), Liu et al (2015), Li et al (2015) and Song et al (2017) employed sparse coding techniques for finding the salient sentences as summaries. conducted salience estimation jointly considering reconstructions on several different vector spaces generated by a variational auto-ecoder framework.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%