1988
DOI: 10.1116/1.575632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary Abstract: Self-deconvolution in C V V Auger electron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the atomic matrix elements are known, then the TDOS can be interpreted as the LDOS, D(E) [26-281. Our (self-)deconvolution method [12,15,29] bypasses numerical problems such as the ambiguities of the square root of the complex phase in Fourier transforms [8,27,28] and the difficulties of the choice of the starting point of the sequential digital method developed by Hagstrum and Becker [6,7]. This method is based on global approximation using splines [30] and a modified non-linear least-squares fitting routine (Levenberg-Marquardt) [31].…”
Section: Determination Of the Tdos Of Clean Si(io0)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the atomic matrix elements are known, then the TDOS can be interpreted as the LDOS, D(E) [26-281. Our (self-)deconvolution method [12,15,29] bypasses numerical problems such as the ambiguities of the square root of the complex phase in Fourier transforms [8,27,28] and the difficulties of the choice of the starting point of the sequential digital method developed by Hagstrum and Becker [6,7]. This method is based on global approximation using splines [30] and a modified non-linear least-squares fitting routine (Levenberg-Marquardt) [31].…”
Section: Determination Of the Tdos Of Clean Si(io0)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting the screening of the s-like valence band electrons of the core hole and final state shakeoff effects the Auger lineshape is mainly determined by step (ii) [2,10,12,22,23,[26][27][28]321 and the distortions are due to the first and third step.…”
Section: Correction Of the Auger Lineshapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-deconvolution of A(E) with the assumption of constant atomic matrix elements across the valence band [6,7] can be interpreted as a transition density of states (TDOS). If the atomic matrix elements are known, then the TDOS can be interpreted as the LDOS, D(E) [26-281. Our (self-)deconvolution method [12,15,29] bypasses numerical problems such as the ambiguities of the square root of the complex phase in Fourier transforms [8,27,28] and the difficulties of the choice of the starting point of the sequential digital method developed by Hagstrum and Becker [6,7]. This method is based on global approximation using splines [30] and a modified non-linear least-squares fitting routine (Levenberg-Marquardt) [31].…”
Section: Determination Of the Tdos Of Clean Si(io0)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) The Auger electron is scattered elastically and inelastically by the distorted surface charge distributions and the escaping Auger electron is distorted by the detection apparatus. Neglecting the screening of the s-like valence band electrons of the core hole and final state shakeoff effects the Auger lineshape is mainly determined by step (ii) [2,10,12,22,23,[26][27][28]321 and the distortions are due to the first and third step.…”
Section: Correction Of the Auger Lineshapementioning
confidence: 99%