2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00056-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary measures and statistics in the analysis of quality of life data: an example from an EORTC–NCIC–SAKK locally advanced breast cancer study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RAND36 measures aspects of health relevant to functional status and well-being [66] and is valid/reliable (α = 0.75−0.91) in breast cancer [67][68][69]. Self-reported responses yield four physical and four mental subscales (scored 0−100: higher scores = better health).…”
Section: Psychosocial Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAND36 measures aspects of health relevant to functional status and well-being [66] and is valid/reliable (α = 0.75−0.91) in breast cancer [67][68][69]. Self-reported responses yield four physical and four mental subscales (scored 0−100: higher scores = better health).…”
Section: Psychosocial Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a summary measure of variable pain for every patient, an area under curve (AUC) was calculated according to the trapezium rule. 14 High-dose chemotherapy and transplantation. All patients received a high-dose chemotherapy schedule (STAMP-V): cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m 2 , thiotepa 500 mg/m 2 and carboplatin 800 mg/m 2 as continuous infusion over 96 h from days À7 through À3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUC has not been investigated using simulated data informed by PRO questionnaires, although some have considered single PRO data sets (Curran et al, 2000; D. L. Fairclough, 1997;Qian et al, 2000). R. J.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%