Summated human EEG potentials with voluntary movement

Gilden, Lloyd; Vaughan, Herbert G.; Costa, Louis D.

doi:10.1016/0013-4694(66)90100-3

Cited by 281 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They termed that slow negative potential the "readiness potential" and found it to be bilateral, but maximal on the contralateral side to the responding limb. This was also observed by Gilden et al (1966) who described its distribution and amplitude, attributing it to a generator in the Rolandic area corresponding to the neural area involved with the initiation and control of a voluntary movement. The readiness potential will be related to the CNV in the discussion.…”

supporting

confidence: 59%

“…I suggested that, by suitable application of the averaging procedure, it should be possible to detect and analyze separately the sensory and motor components of sensorimotor sequences and to approach directly the problem of the central correlates of human perceptual and cognitive processes (Vaughan, 1962). This presumption has received substantial empirical support (e.g., Vaughan and Costa, 1964;Vaughan et al, 1966 ;Gilden et al, 1966;. Since cerebral processes may be related to voluntary movement and to relatively stimulus-independent psychological processes (e.g., Ritter et al, 1968), the term "evoked potentials" is no longer sufficiently general to apply to all E E G phenomena related to sensorimotor processes.…”

Section: Average Evoked Potentialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These phenomena have been studied in a variety of experimental situations in animals (Rowland, 1968), which indicates that SPS may accompany a variety of sensory, motor, and motivational processes. I n man, S P S occurrence with voluntary movement was demonstrated by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965) and by Gilden et al (1966). I n view of the varied behavioral correlates of SP in man and experimental animals and the difficulties encountered in excluding the contribution by extracranial sources (notably the EOG) , it is clear that investigators of human S P S have not yet come to grips with the complexity of their behavioral and physiological correlates.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data from a subject who moved his eyes in opposite directions as an overt response and careful recording of eye position during the production of the CNV also confirm this opinion, as seen in figure 4-13. However, the fact that eye movements can simulate the CNV makes it imperative to monitor them for both experimental and clinical work.We should consider another possible internal brain source for the CNV, that is, the generator for the motor potential (MP) described by Gilden et al (1966), who report the maximal negativity of up to 160 AVERAGE EVOKED POTEN!LULEJ FIGURE 4-11.--Oomparison of the CNV in anticipation of making a motor response and of seeing a picture; (A) and (C) are two sets of averages showing that maximal gradient of the CNV is posterior between the P and 0 leads when a picture is expected; (B) shows that the gradient is more anterior when the subject expects t o make a motor response (same subject) ; (D) shows the result when the subject must press a button to make the picture appear, indicating a larger CNV than either alone. The last trace shows the stability of the leads around the eye.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Average evoked potentials: Methods, results, and evaluations.

Donchin

Lindsley²

1969

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

to discuss current problems in the study of average evoked potential. As can be seen from %he list of participants, most laboratories, in &his country and abroad, thak aotively use signal-averaging techniques in processing electroencephalographic records were represented at the conference. Our objective in organizing this conference was to provide a forum for discussing the problems involved in conducting these gtudies and in communicating the results of experiments.For this purpose, the conference was organized in the following format. Six investigators were invited to prepare critical reviews of the literature-each on one of six assigned topics. The reviews mere made available to all the conference participants 4 to 6 weeks before the conference. Each review was to serve as the text for one &hour session at the conference. The reviewer was allotted 20 minutes to restate some of the main points presented in ahis paper; then discussion was opened to all participants. The discussions were moderated in each case by an assigned discussant.Chapters 2 through 7 present the review papers and the ensuing discussion. The remarks made by the reviewer were deleted since their substance is presented in the review.All the principal speakers completed their assignment on time, and the reviews were sent to the participants. However Dr. Vaughan's report, as included in this volume, is substantially differen6 from the document that he circulated to the participants. For this reason, the discussants ignore much of the material presented in his present chapter.I n addition to the working sessions of the conference, two evening sessions featured extended presentations. I n the first one, Dr. Lindsley surveyed the evoked potential technique, its history, and achievements; in the second one, Dr. Frank Morrell discussed the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the average evoked response. Dr. Lindsley's talk provided the material for Chapter 1. A supplement contains m IV FOREWORD reports that were submitted by participants to expand and elaborate upon some of the comments they made in the discussion.The conference would not have been possible without the support of the O5ce of Space Science and Applications, NASA Headquarters and Dr. Orr Reynolds. Dr. Norman Weissman of NASA Headquarters was instrumental in providing support, both in the organization of the conference and in the publication of the Proceedings. His patience and understanding are deeply appreciated. Ames Research Center, where at the time I held a National Research Council Resident Research Associateship, provided much necessary help. Dr. Jorge Huertas was especially considerate. The organization of the conference down to the last detail was in the very capable hands of Mrs. Mary-Frances Thompson of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. Special thanks are due her for the magnificent job she has done.Since we have deleted all the chairman's non-technical remarks, the Proceedings fail to underline the able chairmanship provided by Dr. D. B. Lindsley, who ran...

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 59%

Section: Average Evoked Potentialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Average evoked potentials: Methods, results, and evaluations.

Donchin

Lindsley²

1969

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Motor Potentials have been used since the 1960s to investigate motor activity and a contingent negative variation (Walter, Cooper, Aldridge, McCallum, & Winter, 1964) associated with motor planning and motor preparation (Deecke, Scheid, & Kornhuber, 1969;Gilden, Vaughan, & Costa, 1966;Kornhuber & Deecke, 1965;Vaughan, Costa, & Ritter, 1968). Recent work investigated the similarity of the Motor Potentials and motor evoked potentials elicited by motor execution, motor imagery, and motor suppression.…”

Section: B Motor Potentials and Motor Evoked Potentialsmentioning

confidence: 99%