2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sumoylation of internally initiated Sp3 isoforms regulates transcriptional repression via a Trichostatin A-insensitive mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, for Sp3, we have observed striking differences of protein half life depending on the presence of growth factors. Our data further increase the complexity of the regulation of Sp3 in particular the fact that different Sp3 isoforms result for internal initiation of translation (Kennett et al, 1997) but also the recent advances showing that sumoylation of Sp3 represses its transcriptional activity (Sapetschnig et al, 2002(Sapetschnig et al, , 2004Spengler et al, 2005). It is interesting to note that the Erk phosphorylation site is situated in the long Sp3 isoform, which behaves as an activator of transcription (Kennett et al, 1997) or a repressor depending on the promoter (Lambiase et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, for Sp3, we have observed striking differences of protein half life depending on the presence of growth factors. Our data further increase the complexity of the regulation of Sp3 in particular the fact that different Sp3 isoforms result for internal initiation of translation (Kennett et al, 1997) but also the recent advances showing that sumoylation of Sp3 represses its transcriptional activity (Sapetschnig et al, 2002(Sapetschnig et al, , 2004Spengler et al, 2005). It is interesting to note that the Erk phosphorylation site is situated in the long Sp3 isoform, which behaves as an activator of transcription (Kennett et al, 1997) or a repressor depending on the promoter (Lambiase et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SUMO-dependent transcriptional repression appears to be independent of HDACs (64). Horowitz and colleagues found that Sp3 isoforms (Sp3, M1, and M2) are sumoylated at Lys551 (60). Recent studies indicate that levels of sumoylated Sp1 are attenuated during tumorigenesis (66).…”
Section: Chromatin Recruitment and Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sumoylated Sp1 is found in the cytosol interacting with rpt6, and this interaction leads to increased Sp1 proteolysis and degradation (66). Decreased levels of cytosolic Sp1 as a consequence of sumoylation reduce the pool of Sp1 that would otherwise migrate to the nucleus (60). Modifications of Sp1 can occur simultaneously and synergistically.…”
Section: Chromatin Recruitment and Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 Therefore Lysine-551 may act as a molecular switch controlling the SUMO-mediated repression and acetyl-mediated activation of Sp3. Similarly, Sp1 KRL-16 serves as a molecular switch that is controlled by the competing homologous modifiers SUMO-1 (repression) and ubiquitin (activation/proteolytic processing).…”
Section: © 2 0 0 8 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S mentioning
confidence: 99%