2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0872-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunspot Observations and Counting at Specola Solare Ticinese in Locarno Since 1957

Abstract: Specola Solare Ticinese is an observatory dedicated to Sunspot Number counting, which was constructed in 1957 in Locarno, Southern Switzerland, as an external observing station of the Zurich Federal Observatory. When in 1981 the responsibility of the determination of the International Sunspot Number was assumed by the Royal Observatory of Belgium, Specola Solare Ticinese was given the role of pilot station, with the aim of preserving the continuity in the counting method. We report the observing procedure and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Clette et al (2014), Svalgaard, Cagnotti, andCortesi (2017) conclude that this alternate counting method is the most likely cause of the 1947 scale jump in the original SN series. However, the timing and sharpness of the jump seem to be contradicted by the fact that this weighting practice was introduced progressively well before 1947, in the early 20th century by Wolfer (Cortesi et al, 2016;Svalgaard, Cagnotti, and Cortesi, 2017). Although Wolfer himself never used it for his own counts (Svalgaard, Cagnotti, and Cortesi, 2017), this practice was implemented to help assistants aligning their raw counts on the reference of Wolfer, the primary observer.…”
Section: A Major Disruption: Zurich Observersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Clette et al (2014), Svalgaard, Cagnotti, andCortesi (2017) conclude that this alternate counting method is the most likely cause of the 1947 scale jump in the original SN series. However, the timing and sharpness of the jump seem to be contradicted by the fact that this weighting practice was introduced progressively well before 1947, in the early 20th century by Wolfer (Cortesi et al, 2016;Svalgaard, Cagnotti, and Cortesi, 2017). Although Wolfer himself never used it for his own counts (Svalgaard, Cagnotti, and Cortesi, 2017), this practice was implemented to help assistants aligning their raw counts on the reference of Wolfer, the primary observer.…”
Section: A Major Disruption: Zurich Observersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first article in this section, by Vaquero et al (2016), represents one of the key outputs of the sunspotnumber workshops: the revised Schatten (1998a, 1998b) group sunspot number data base (1610 -present). This section also contains valuable reports from the longstanding observatories at Locarno (since 1957;Cortesi et al, 2016), Debrecen (since 1958; Baranyi, Gyori, andKanzelhöhe (since 1943;Pötzi et al, 2016), as well as a description of the ≈ ten-year record (2003 -2012) of sunspot numbers obtained by the ISOON telescope (Balasubramaniam and Henry, 2016).…”
Section: Organization and Brief Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are several historical examples of single astronomers with a long observation series. For example, this is the case of Hisako Koyama with 37 observation years (Koyama, 1985;Knipp et al, 2017), David Hadden with 42 years (Carrasco et al, 2013), Sergio Cortesi with 55 years (Cortesi et al, 2016;Clette et al, 2016), and Thomas Cragg and Herbert Luft with 63 and 65 observation years respectively (Vaquero et al, 2016). These long data series provided by single observers are particularly valuable in order to maintain the homogeneity of the sunspot number series, even more valuable than institutional observatories performing their observations with multiple shifts (Clette et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%