“…However, there are a number of reasons why this assumption may be flawed which include differences in the size and number of particles administered [12] , the catheter position [13] , [14] , [15] , administration flow rates [13] , [14] , [15] and regional blood flow differences between administrations [16] . Previous studies have compared the pre- and post-therapy imaging [14] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , with the majority of these studies taking no account of the differences in the partial volume effect of the images [14] , [17] , [18] , [19] . However, Gnesin et al [20] applied recovery coefficients to predicted and delivered absorbed doses to tumours derived from 99m Tc-MAA SPECT and 90 Y PET images respectively, while a recent study by Mikell et al [21] convolved 90 Y PET images with a Gaussian function to match the spatial resolution of 99m Tc-MAA SPECT images.…”