2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-019-4124-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercell calculations of the geometry and lattice energy of α-glycine crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lattice energy values of −138.74, −144.14, and −141.63 kJ mol –1 were obtained for α, β, and γ-glycine, respectively. In our previous work, calculations for the lattice energy for α-glycine have been performed in a cluster approach, with the best value (−64.22 kJ mol –1 ), obtained in a 2 × 1 × 2 supercell at the B3LYP-gCP-D3/def2-TZVPP level . Marom et al reported relative electronic energies values using the many-body dispersion correction (MBD), with best values obtained at the PBEh + MBD level: 0.96 and 1.50 kJ mol –1 , for the α and β phases, respectively, in relation to the γ-glycine electronic energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lattice energy values of −138.74, −144.14, and −141.63 kJ mol –1 were obtained for α, β, and γ-glycine, respectively. In our previous work, calculations for the lattice energy for α-glycine have been performed in a cluster approach, with the best value (−64.22 kJ mol –1 ), obtained in a 2 × 1 × 2 supercell at the B3LYP-gCP-D3/def2-TZVPP level . Marom et al reported relative electronic energies values using the many-body dispersion correction (MBD), with best values obtained at the PBEh + MBD level: 0.96 and 1.50 kJ mol –1 , for the α and β phases, respectively, in relation to the γ-glycine electronic energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, calculations for the lattice energy for α-glycine have been performed in a cluster approach, with the best value (−64.22 kJ mol −1 ), obtained in a 2 × 1 × 2 supercell at the B3LYP-gCP-D3/def2-TZVPP level. 66 Marom et al 27 reported relative electronic energies values using the many-body dispersion correction (MBD), with best values obtained at the PBEh + MBD level: 0.96 and 1.50 kJ mol −1 , for the α and β phases, respectively, in relation to the γ-glycine electronic energy. Thermal corrections have been included in the relative energies showing good results for the α − γ energy difference.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometries of all model structures were fully optimised using the ωB97X-D3 functional in combination with the def2-TZVPP basis sets [38][39][40][41]. This method is applicable for a wide range of quantum chemical issues: atomic charges and chemical reactivity of organic and inorganic systems [42][43][44][45][46][47]. Previously, we have successfully applied the ωB97X-D3 functional for various calculations of closo-borate peculiarities: B-X (X = C, O, N, F) chemical bonding, non-covalent interactions, and molecular reactivity [35,48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computation method. The theoretical calculation was performed using the CASTEP module of Material Studio [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. A four-layer supercell of 2 2 2 with a vacuum layer thickness of 13 Å was used to simulate the surface of the catalyst.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%