2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercoiling-mediated feedback rapidly couples and tunes transcription

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3-fold decrease for SGD, 4-fold decrease for GS, 1-fold decrease for GO) (Figure D). The repetitive use of the strong promoter may have caused homology-mediated epigenetic silencing or disturbed the transcriptional dynamics, when using the 4TU_SGD_GS_GO_Redox1 vector. , This is the likely cause of the decrease in PCA yield, as the levels of Redox2 and SAT coinfiltrated on separate vectors remained high under all conditions (Supplementary Figure S3). Notably, in the 2TU_SGD_GS + 2TU_GO_Redox1 coinfiltration experiments, the relative gene expression of SGD, GS, and GO was significantly higher compared to levels of these same genes in not only the 4 TU construct 4TU SGD_GS_GO_Redox1, but also with the positive control in which all genes were expressed from separate plasmids (All SlUbq10 coinfiltration) (Figure D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3-fold decrease for SGD, 4-fold decrease for GS, 1-fold decrease for GO) (Figure D). The repetitive use of the strong promoter may have caused homology-mediated epigenetic silencing or disturbed the transcriptional dynamics, when using the 4TU_SGD_GS_GO_Redox1 vector. , This is the likely cause of the decrease in PCA yield, as the levels of Redox2 and SAT coinfiltrated on separate vectors remained high under all conditions (Supplementary Figure S3). Notably, in the 2TU_SGD_GS + 2TU_GO_Redox1 coinfiltration experiments, the relative gene expression of SGD, GS, and GO was significantly higher compared to levels of these same genes in not only the 4 TU construct 4TU SGD_GS_GO_Redox1, but also with the positive control in which all genes were expressed from separate plasmids (All SlUbq10 coinfiltration) (Figure D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repetitive use of the strong promoter may have caused homology-mediated epigenetic silencing or disturbed the transcriptional dynamics, when using the 4TU_SGD_GS_GO_Redox1 vector. 40,41 This is the likely cause of the decrease in PCA yield, as the levels of Redox2 and SAT coinfiltrated on separate vectors remained high under all conditions (Supplementary Figure S3). Notably, The statistically significant difference between PCA yields are marked with an asterisk.…”
Section: Acs Synthetic Biologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, 44.9% of all TUs overlap with either GapR or TopoI peaks, and 73.1% of these overlapping regions are contributed by only GapR peaks. Previous studies have shown that DNA supercoils generated by ongoing transcription activities could modulate the cooperativity of adjacent RNA polymerase molecules on the same gene and also impact the transcription of adjacent genes 20 21 . Therefore, the observation that more GapR than TopoI peaks reside in adjacent genes suggest that positive supercoiling also plays a more pervasive role than negative supercoiling in regulating E. coli transcription.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ratiometric reporter assays, we found that the position in which genes are located within multigene constructs differentially affects their expression ( Figure 3 ). In other systems, the dominance of the upstream genes has been proposed to be caused by positive supercoiling accumulates downstream of constitutively active genes, altering RNA polymerase binding and initiation (Johnstone and Galloway, 2022). In our work, we found the extent to which genes were affected by co-assembly to be sequence-dependent ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%