2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.022324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting qubit as a probe of squeezing in a nonlinear resonator

Abstract: In addition to their central role in quantum information processing, qubits have proven to be useful tools in a range of other applications such as enhanced quantum sensing and as spectrometers of quantum noise. Here we show that a superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a nonlinear resonator can act as a probe of quantum fluctuations of the intra-resonator field.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generation and measurement of squeezing has been the subject of much recent research in the field of circuit QED [59][60][61][62]. When U = 0, it is known that the maximum squeezing the can be achieved is a factor of 2, reducing the fluctuations in one field quadrature to 50% of those of the vacuum state [1].…”
Section: Generation Of Squeezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generation and measurement of squeezing has been the subject of much recent research in the field of circuit QED [59][60][61][62]. When U = 0, it is known that the maximum squeezing the can be achieved is a factor of 2, reducing the fluctuations in one field quadrature to 50% of those of the vacuum state [1].…”
Section: Generation Of Squeezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear cavity response [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] is measured as a function of the magnetic flux that is applied to the qubit. At weak driving and when the ratio between the qubit frequency and the cavity fundamental mode frequency is tuned close to the value ω a /ω c = 1 the common Jaynes-Cummings resonance, which henceforth is referred to as the primary resonance, is observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, however, on-chip amplification drives a second, parasitic measurement process in whichσ z information is encoded in other statistical moments of the output field. This dephasing mechanism is predicted to be independent of the mean field in the resonator, making it distinct from effects in resonantly current-pumped systems [25][26][27][28][29][30]. A rough heuristic model describes the parasitic measurement in two steps: the phase-sensitive on-chip gain squeezes the microwave vacuum noise, and the resultant output squeezed state is rotated in phase by the dispersive interaction, encodingσ z information in the covariance of the outputfield quadratures.…”
Section: Measurement Backaction With On-chip Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%