2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1515098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting trapped-field magnets: Temperature and field distributions during pulsed-field activation

Abstract: We calculate the temperature and magnetic field distributions in a bulk superconductor during the process of pulsed-field magnetic activation. The calculations are based on the heat diffusion equation with account of the heat produced by flux motion, and the critical state model with temperature dependent critical current density. For a given activation time the total amount of trapped flux Φ is maximum for an optimal value Bopt of the maximal applied field. We analyze how Bopt and Φ depend on the material par… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first pulse of 2.99 T was slightly smaller than the Bj at 70 K which partially magnetized the sample at the periphery where heat was generated [36]. The effect of this two-step method can be evidently found in figure 4(b) where the temperature rise for single-and multi-pulse PFM at 30 K (red open and solid circles) was compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first pulse of 2.99 T was slightly smaller than the Bj at 70 K which partially magnetized the sample at the periphery where heat was generated [36]. The effect of this two-step method can be evidently found in figure 4(b) where the temperature rise for single-and multi-pulse PFM at 30 K (red open and solid circles) was compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From application perspective, pulse field magnetization (PFM) is more feasible because a large current has to be fed only for a very short time and the magnetizing coil can be made small [2; 3]. PFM is, however, less effective than the FC method because of the heat that is generated by the dissipative motion of flux lines [2][3][4][5][6]. Most significantly, the difference in the trapped field with the FC method tends to escalate when the ability of trapping flux lines increases by improving the material characteristic or by decreasing the temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the used material in our work (YBaCuo), the good value of n is taken equal to 20 at T = 77 K [13]. In this paper we have adopted a linear model to describe the dependence of the critical current on temperature [19]:…”
Section: Basic Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%