1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(95)00425-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconductivity and magnetic order in RSr2Cu2.7Mo0.3O7−δ (R = Y, Pr, Gd, and Tb)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No cusp at superconducting transition temperature appear in the c vs. T measurement (data not shown). No magnetic anomalies are observed down to 4.2 K. These results are consistent with those observed in magnetic susceptibility measurements and those already published [13]. Fig.…”
Section: Solubility Limit Of Mo Magnetism and Superconductivity In Thesupporting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No cusp at superconducting transition temperature appear in the c vs. T measurement (data not shown). No magnetic anomalies are observed down to 4.2 K. These results are consistent with those observed in magnetic susceptibility measurements and those already published [13]. Fig.…”
Section: Solubility Limit Of Mo Magnetism and Superconductivity In Thesupporting
confidence: 95%
“…5 shows the superconducting transition measured at 10 Oe for two different oxygen annealed samples (sample B and sample C). The onset of the FC transition occurs at 29 K and 36 K for sample B and sample C, respectively, which are comparable with those reported previously [4,13]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Solubility Limit Of Mo Magnetism and Superconductivity In Thesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the model is for ferromagnets and our materials are antiferromagnetic. Therefore, even though Tsay et al 26 and Lai et al 27 have applied the model successfully in the antiferromagnetic oxide system, we believe that this mechanism may not be applicable in our cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…25 In the case of Gd 2 Fe 3 Si 5 , the large linear term has been suggested to be due to a two-dimensional ferromagnetic spin waves ͑where the magnon dispersion relation is proportional to q 2 , where q is the wave vector͒ or from onedimensional antiferromagnetic spin waves ͑where the magnon dispersion relation is proportional to q). 15 Tsay et al 26 and Lai et al 27 have explained the observation of a hump in the heat capacity of several Gd-based antiferromagnetic oxide compounds, on the basis of the model proposed by Fishman and Liu. 28 Fishman and Liu 28 have shown that a hump could originate in a Heisenberg ferromagnet from quantum spin fluctuations induced by a transverse degree of freedom.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%