Superconsistency of Tests in High Dimensions

Abstract

To assess whether there is some signal in a big database, aggregate tests for the global null hypothesis of no effect are routinely applied in practice before more specialized analysis is carried out. Although a plethora of aggregate tests is available, each test has its strengths but also its blind spots. In a Gaussian sequence model, we study whether it is possible to obtain a test with substantially better consistency properties than the likelihood ratio (i.e., Euclidean norm based) test. We establish an impossibility result, showing that in the high-dimensional framework we consider, the set of alternatives for which a test may improve upon the likelihood ratio test -that is, its superconsistency points -is always asymptotically negligible in a relative volume sense. * MSC 2020 subject classifications: 62F05 (Primary); 62F03, 62C20 (Secondary).