2002
DOI: 10.1021/ac020302e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Potential Migrants from Paper and Board Intended for Use As Food Packaging Materials

Abstract: The optimization of supercritical fluid extraction using CO2 for the extraction of contaminants in 15 samples of recycled paper and board (P&B) has been studied. An experimental design was used for simultaneous optimization of the variables involved in both the extraction step and the collection of the extract. Methanol was used as modifier. Several plastisizers such as diethyl phthalate, diisobutyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, dioctyl adipate, and diethylhexyl phthalate (from 2 to 100 microg/g of paper) w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, various pretreatment techniques have been attempted to extract PAEs from different samples, such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [6,7], solid-phase extraction (SPE) [8][9][10][11][12][13], solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [14][15][16][17][18], liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [19], LPME method based on the solidification of a floating organic microdrop (LPME-SFO) [20], accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) [21], stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [22], single-drop microextraction (SDME) [23], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [24][25][26], hollow fiber-based liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) [27], polymer monolith microextraction (PMME) [28], supercritical fluid extraction [29], and ultrasound-assisted emulsification-microextraction (USAEME) [30]. Among them, SPE and SPME are the mostly used techniques for environmental analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, various pretreatment techniques have been attempted to extract PAEs from different samples, such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [6,7], solid-phase extraction (SPE) [8][9][10][11][12][13], solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [14][15][16][17][18], liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [19], LPME method based on the solidification of a floating organic microdrop (LPME-SFO) [20], accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) [21], stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [22], single-drop microextraction (SDME) [23], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [24][25][26], hollow fiber-based liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) [27], polymer monolith microextraction (PMME) [28], supercritical fluid extraction [29], and ultrasound-assisted emulsification-microextraction (USAEME) [30]. Among them, SPE and SPME are the mostly used techniques for environmental analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 However, most of these compounds are semi-volatile or non-volatile, which means that their likely migration to the food in contact with the P&B in which they could be present mainly takes place either through the vapour phase or through direct contact between the food and the packaging material. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The migration process between two solids, food and paper, is a slow process, and, consequently, from the point of view of food safety, a lower risk could be expected in short-time contact. 13,14 However, when volatile compounds are involved, the migration is faster and the compounds can reach the food in a very short period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current recycling systems cannot remove all potential contaminants efficiently; some may be present in the finished board and thus can potentially migrate into the food. Indeed, diisopropylnaphthalenes such as 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene (DIPN), phthalates such as dibutylphthalate (DBP), as well as other potentially hazardous chemicals were detected in foods and food packages (Castle et al 1989;Nerin et al 1993Nerin et al , 2002Sturaro et al 1994Sturaro et al , 1995University of Rome 'La Sapienza' 1995;Sipilainen-Malm et al 1997;Aurela et al 1999;Boccacci et al 1999;Petersen and Breindahl 2000;Grob 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%