2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-014-0836-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical Mean Field Equations on Convex Domains and the Onsager’s Statistical Description of Two-Dimensional Turbulence

Abstract: We are motivated by the study of the Microcanonical Variational Principle within Onsager’s description of two-dimensional turbulence in the range of energies where the equivalence of statistical ensembles fails. We obtain sufficient conditions for the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the corresponding Mean Field Equation on convex and “thin” enough domains in the supercritical (with respect to the Moser–Trudinger inequality) regime. This is a brand new achievement since existence results in the supe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for D simply connected and λ = 8π, Chang, Chen and Lin [5] gave necessary and sufficient conditions for (1.1) to have a solution. To our knowledge, a part from a recent result on some convex domains obtained by Bartolucci and De Marchis [1] indicated there are no further results concerning the resonant supercritical case λ ∈ 8πN and λ > 8π. This result has been recently extended for not simply connected domains by Bartolucci and Lin [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, for D simply connected and λ = 8π, Chang, Chen and Lin [5] gave necessary and sufficient conditions for (1.1) to have a solution. To our knowledge, a part from a recent result on some convex domains obtained by Bartolucci and De Marchis [1] indicated there are no further results concerning the resonant supercritical case λ ∈ 8πN and λ > 8π. This result has been recently extended for not simply connected domains by Bartolucci and Lin [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There exist p 0 > 1 and 0 > 0 such that for any p ∈ (1, p 0 ), ∈ (0, 0 ) and R > 0 we have for any φ, φ 1 There exist p 0 > 1 and 0 > 0 such that for any p ∈ (1, p 0 ), ∈ (0, 0 ) and R > 0 we have for any φ, φ 1 …”
Section: A Contraction Mapping Argument and The Proof Of The Main Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify our notation, we shall always assume |M | = 1. Equation (1.3) and its counterpart on bounded planar domains arise in several areas of mathematics and physics and there are by now many results concerning existence ( [2,15,9,10,11,24,29,30,41,42]), uniqueness of solutions ( [4,12,13,14,26,47,48,49,60,65]) and blow-up analysis ( [3,5,16,17,19,28,31,57,58]). On one hand, they are derived as a mean field limit in the statistical mechanics description of two dimensional turbulent Euler flows ( [20,21]) and selfgravitating systems ( [54,56,72]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition 1.3. Let h = e H and let µ + be defined as in (6). Let ω ⊆ Ω be a nonempty subdomain and let ω be given as in Definition 1.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy to prove Theorem 1.2 is inspired by the one in [23], with several non-trivial improvements needed to deal with general singular data (given by some measures as in (6)) and non-smooth domains. To this end, the first tool we need is an Alexandrov-Bol's inequality for solutions of (5) suitable for our setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%