1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.12509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercurrent and quasiparticle interference between twod-wave superconductors coupled by a normal metal or insulator

Abstract: In the presence of an elastic barrier at both interfaces of a mesoscopic d-wave superconductor-normalmetal-d-wave superconductor ͑DND junction͒, the Josephson current at zero temperature is studied by using a simple matrix method. As a limiting case, the tunneling between two d-wave superconductors coupled by a insulator barrier ͑DID structure͒ is particularly addressed. The effects of sign change and anisotropic gap structure of the d x 2 Ϫy 2 superconductor are carefully considered in the Andreev reflection.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pairing symmetry does not significantly affect the normal-state resistivity R n A of the interfaces. The high R n A values of typically 10 Ϫ8 ⍀ cm 2 , which correspond to resistivities of the order of 10 Ϫ1 ⍀ cm for an assumed effective thickness of a resistive region of ϳ1 nm (Chaudhari, Dimos, and Mannhart, 1990), are indicative 11 See, for example, Millis, 1994;Barash et al, 1995;Bruder et al, 1995;Deutscher and Maynard, 1995;Kashiwaya, 1995, 1996;Tang et al, 1996;Walker and Luettmer-Strathmann, 1996;Fogelströ m et al, 1997;Hurd, 1997;Fogelströ m and Yip, 1998;Lö fwander, Johansson, et al, 1998;Lö fwander, Shumeiko, and Wendin, 1998;Ö stlund, 1998;Golubov and Kupryianov, 1999;Hogan-O'Neill et al, 1999; FIG. 58.…”
Section: Interface Charging and Band Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairing symmetry does not significantly affect the normal-state resistivity R n A of the interfaces. The high R n A values of typically 10 Ϫ8 ⍀ cm 2 , which correspond to resistivities of the order of 10 Ϫ1 ⍀ cm for an assumed effective thickness of a resistive region of ϳ1 nm (Chaudhari, Dimos, and Mannhart, 1990), are indicative 11 See, for example, Millis, 1994;Barash et al, 1995;Bruder et al, 1995;Deutscher and Maynard, 1995;Kashiwaya, 1995, 1996;Tang et al, 1996;Walker and Luettmer-Strathmann, 1996;Fogelströ m et al, 1997;Hurd, 1997;Fogelströ m and Yip, 1998;Lö fwander, Johansson, et al, 1998;Lö fwander, Shumeiko, and Wendin, 1998;Ö stlund, 1998;Golubov and Kupryianov, 1999;Hogan-O'Neill et al, 1999; FIG. 58.…”
Section: Interface Charging and Band Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) is due to the difference of the temperature dependence of G p (ϕ) and G n (ϕ). The Josephson effect in d/I/N/I/d (d-wave superconductor/insulator/normal metal/insulator/d-wave superconductor) junctions was also studied recently [34,44,45]. The nonmonotonous temperature dependence of the maximum Josephson current is expected similar to the case of a d/I/d junction, where the length of the normal region is smaller than the coherence length in the normal region.…”
Section: Theory Of the Josephson Effect In D/i/d Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the past few years there have been a number of microscopic calculations of surfaces and interfaces in superconducting systems with a d-wave order parameter. Most of the theoretical results have been obtained using tunnelling theory, or Andreev's approximation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] in which the tunnelling barrier and the order parameter are not found self-consistently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%