2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superimposed Information Architecture for Digital Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of these systems do not combine the capabilities to work with textand content-based description and retrieval of parts of images. With regard to integrating subdocuments with digital libraries, we developed an architecture for representing SI in DSpace 8 [17]. The focus of that work was mainly on text documents, with limited support for images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these systems do not combine the capabilities to work with textand content-based description and retrieval of parts of images. With regard to integrating subdocuments with digital libraries, we developed an architecture for representing SI in DSpace 8 [17]. The focus of that work was mainly on text documents, with limited support for images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An annotation service addressing parts of documents managed by a digital library system through the concept of marks is presented by Archer et al [5]. Annotations can be stored either together with the document or in an external repository.…”
Section: Existing Annotation and Link Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for re-attachment of the annotation to text or locations within a document using a generalized document model. This research has been extended by Corubolo and colleagues [8] to cross formats and locations, and re-used in subsequent work in the context of DL architectures [3]. Although recent versions of the software have an RDF serialization for the annotation model, it would be difficult to describe the approach as web-centric.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strings are not web resources; they of course do not have a URI. However, there are many services that will happily assign URIs to strings for free, such as Twitter 3 , various blog platforms or Google Docs 4 . Henceforth we treat Content nodes as resources on the web with their own URIs, even if they did not start their existence with one.…”
Section: Open Annotation Data Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%