2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3491797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superiority of common-base to common-emitter heterojunction bipolar transistors

Abstract: Common-emitter (CE) configuration of bipolar junction transistors has been used in virtually all amplifications since the invention of transistor, whereas common-base (CB) configuration has been rarely used due to its inferior performance in comparison to CE. For heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs) this conviction needs to be changed. We compared the radio-frequency (rf) power handling capability of the HBT between CE and CB configurations and analyzed their amplification mechanisms. It is found that CB … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the high gain of the CB topology at mm-wave frequencies makes it a suitable core for PA cells. The power performance superiority of the CB configuration over CE DHBTs appears to confirm the analysis of Qin et al [23]. Whereas InP/GaAsSb CB DHBTs perform better than CE devices for low P IN (and conversely for high P IN , as for SiGe HBTs in [23]), InP/GaInAsSb CB DHBTs are superior to CE devices for all input power levels (Fig.…”
Section: Large-signal Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Additionally, the high gain of the CB topology at mm-wave frequencies makes it a suitable core for PA cells. The power performance superiority of the CB configuration over CE DHBTs appears to confirm the analysis of Qin et al [23]. Whereas InP/GaAsSb CB DHBTs perform better than CE devices for low P IN (and conversely for high P IN , as for SiGe HBTs in [23]), InP/GaInAsSb CB DHBTs are superior to CE devices for all input power levels (Fig.…”
Section: Large-signal Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…๐‘–๐‘“ ๐‘–๐‘ ๐‘›โ€ฒ๐‘ก ๐‘“๐‘–๐‘›๐‘Ž๐‘™ ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’ (7) ๐‘… =๐‘… โ€–๐‘… โ€– โ„Ž + (1+โ„Ž ) โ€ข๐‘… โ€–๐‘… with resistive divider in base (8) ๐‘… =๐‘… โ€– โ„Ž + (1+โ„Ž )๐‘… with resistance in base (9) The determination of the output resistance in dynamical regime, R0, of the common collector connection is based on relations (10) and (11) for both cases presented previously.…”
Section: ๐‘… = ๐‘… ๐‘–๐‘“ ๐‘–๐‘ก ๐‘–๐‘  ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘“๐‘–๐‘›๐‘Ž๐‘™ ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’ ๐‘…mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is a need in technology to amplify electrical signals, i.e. to obtain on a load circuit higher power signals but identical in form of time variation with those of low power available, amplifiers are used [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Electronic amplifiers are constructed using bipolar or field effect transistors, either as discrete circuits or as integrated circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is a need in technology to amplify electrical signals, i.e., to obtain on a load circuit higher power signals that are identical in terms of time variation to those of low power available, amplifiers are used [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Electronic amplifiers are constructed using bipolar or field effect transistors, either as discrete circuits or as integrated circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%