1979
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80417-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superoxide anions do not react with hydroperoxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This reaction, too, has a positive Gibbs energy, but more importantly, in 1947 George (53), and later several other groups (54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59) showed that, compared with the rate of superoxide dismutation (60), the reaction, even with triplet oxygen as a product, is too slow to be relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reaction, too, has a positive Gibbs energy, but more importantly, in 1947 George (53), and later several other groups (54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59) showed that, compared with the rate of superoxide dismutation (60), the reaction, even with triplet oxygen as a product, is too slow to be relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Fenton-type reaction involving lipid hydroperoxide reduction would yield alkoxyl radicals (RO') [3]. With superoxide (7) or ferrous iron (8) as the reductant we have respectively:…”
Section: (A) Alkoxyl Radical Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O~ + ROOH ---~ RO" + OH-+ 02 (7) Fe ÷2 + ROOH ----+ RO' + OH-+ Fe ÷3 (8) Whether superoxide can directly reduce lipid peroxides (Eqn. 7) is controversial [8,44].…”
Section: (A) Alkoxyl Radical Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…George showed already in 1947 that the second reaction is too slow in comparison to the disproportionation of superoxide 4 . Nevertheless, a number of groups, unaware of George's work (see also [5][6][7] , set out in the early seventies to determine the rate constant of Reaction 2, and all concluded, like George, that the rate constant was of the order of 1 M , or smaller [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . The recent suggestion 15 that Reaction 2 is significant and that the dioxygen is produced in the 1 ∆ g singlet state must be rejected as erroneous on kinetic and thermodynamic grounds.…”
Section: The Chemistry Of Peroxynitrite a Biological Toxin Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%