2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.214436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superparamagnetism versus superspin glass behavior in dilute magnetic nanoparticle systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
79
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of behaviour has been reported previously where a Langevin function with a linear term has been fit to particles dispersed in a diamagnetic matrix, where the system should behave superparamagentically but the particle sizes calculated from the magnetic moments of the particles are unrealistic for a Langevin function fit (i.e. sub-nanometer [12]). This is also a similar result to our study of producing Ni nanoparticles from the decomposition of Ni(COD) 2 by varying the temperature where a two-term Langevin function is fit to the scaled data but produced particle sizes suggesting sub-nanomater clusters had formed [33].…”
Section: Samples 1 2 Andsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of behaviour has been reported previously where a Langevin function with a linear term has been fit to particles dispersed in a diamagnetic matrix, where the system should behave superparamagentically but the particle sizes calculated from the magnetic moments of the particles are unrealistic for a Langevin function fit (i.e. sub-nanometer [12]). This is also a similar result to our study of producing Ni nanoparticles from the decomposition of Ni(COD) 2 by varying the temperature where a two-term Langevin function is fit to the scaled data but produced particle sizes suggesting sub-nanomater clusters had formed [33].…”
Section: Samples 1 2 Andsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Nanoparticles that are dispersed within a matrix can show some very interesting magnetic properties that are related to interactions between the moments on each particle. Competing interactions and changes in particle size can cause a system to show superparamagnetic, super spin glass or super ferromagnetic properties [11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a decomposition into two uncoupled subsystems, SPM and SSG, was proposed by Chen et al [54] for the samples with high size dispersivity. Probably, this is the result of the interplay between the inhomogeneous distribution, which would lead to formation of SSG on percolating clusters, and the presence of the glassy matrix which diminishes the dipolar interactions that might induce the SSG state for the tiniest nanoparticles [55].…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is puzzling is the prevalence of single particle behavior at low temperatures and of collective behavior at high temperatures. To explain that, we have to invoke the model of two independent subsystems [54]. One subsystem is made of weakly interacting clusters that progressively freeze starting at relatively high temperatures (with the relaxation time obeying Vogel-Fulcher/scaling law dependence) with only a fraction of the superspins participating to the SSG [53].…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of SSG moment is revealed by a significant memory effect in a stop-and-wait protocol of measurement. 5,6 The memory effect turns out to be depending on the temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%