2017
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2017.2689798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superpixel-Based Adaptive Kernel Selection for Angular Effect Normalization of Remote Sensing Images With Kernel Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, additional research is needed to evaluate for sparse canopies and other land-cover types for different ecosystems. Although a combination of the RTM and LTR fixed kernels was chosen in our study, recent studies demonstrate that an adaptive kernels selection approach can improve the accuracy of BRDF models for different land-cover/structural types compared to fixed kernels [23,31]. In addition, the fitting method for BRDF modeling might also affect the correction result as mentioned in [22], especially for non-forest cover types such as wetlands and snow covered surfaces.…”
Section: Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, additional research is needed to evaluate for sparse canopies and other land-cover types for different ecosystems. Although a combination of the RTM and LTR fixed kernels was chosen in our study, recent studies demonstrate that an adaptive kernels selection approach can improve the accuracy of BRDF models for different land-cover/structural types compared to fixed kernels [23,31]. In addition, the fitting method for BRDF modeling might also affect the correction result as mentioned in [22], especially for non-forest cover types such as wetlands and snow covered surfaces.…”
Section: Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that an angular normalization procedure is mandatory to reduce the confounding non-biophysical signals and to sustain the interpretation of the airborne imagery in respect to land surface properties. VHR airborne hyperspectral images acquired over a rugged topography requires disentanglement of soil, vegetation canopy, and relief BRDFs, which remains challenging [21][22][23]. The problem is even more complex with airborne data due to the strong influence of the local slope and aspect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affected vines in this area are situated in a small valley (Figure 14), where terrain roughness and the presence of surrounding shadows significantly contribute to the enhancement of the BRDF effect, which, in turn, results in a noticeable influence on the recorded reflectance. The intrinsic relationship between topography and BRDF has been previously documented in the literature [42][43][44][45][46][47]. In this context, the western slope stands as an illustrative case of how the interaction between terrain morphology and environmental conditions can modulate the behaviour of the BRDF and, consequently, the reflectance in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This phenomenon is often referred to as cross-image dataset shifts [10]. The shifts can either originate from changes in the nature of land surface properties, for example, induced by the phenology of vegetation, or from the background noise caused by varied acquisition and atmospheric conditions [11]- [13] and inconsistent sun-targetsenor geometries [14], [15]. Therefore, appropriate domainadaptation strategies need to be applied to tackle the dataset shifts [16]- [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%