2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superposition model for analyzing the dynamic ground subsidence in mining area of thick loose layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although total iron (Fe t ) was not detected in ROK, the content of Fe t ranged between 17.4 and 24.36% in other countries. A previous study reported that CaO, MnO, and MgO, which generate a considerable portion of steelmaking slag, can be used as alternatives for limestone, dolomite, and manganese ore to effectively reduce iron content and costs [25].…”
Section: Steel Slag Management Regulations and Legal Position In The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although total iron (Fe t ) was not detected in ROK, the content of Fe t ranged between 17.4 and 24.36% in other countries. A previous study reported that CaO, MnO, and MgO, which generate a considerable portion of steelmaking slag, can be used as alternatives for limestone, dolomite, and manganese ore to effectively reduce iron content and costs [25].…”
Section: Steel Slag Management Regulations and Legal Position In The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the actual observation values, the prediction error is large. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical value to deeply study the subsidence mechanism and deformation law of coal seam mining in a thick and loose layer mining area, to accurately predict the movement and deformation of the ground surface, to reasonably keep various types of protective coal pillars, and to protect various protective objects on the surface (Hou et al, 2018).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Mining Subsidence Under Thick Loose Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical models of subsidence prediction have used a prediction function formula to evaluate stress in the rock formation, and the final subsidence curve position after mining was predicted, including empirical equations [15]. A subsidence influence function correction method based on ground observation results, was used to estimate maximum subsidence function under the discontinuous subsidence [16][17][18]. A. G. Corkum used a traditional surface subsidence model to predict the subsidence of a geological model established by the three-dimensional finite difference method [19] and found that the theory was inconsistent with finite element modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%