2021
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superselective adrenal arterial embolization for idiopathic hyperaldosteronism: 12‐month results from a proof‐of‐principle trial

Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to assess the safety, blood pressure changes, and biochemical responses of superselective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE) in hypertensive patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA).Background: SAAE is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used to successfully treat aldosterone-producing adenoma. However, its effect for patients with IHA is unevaluated.Methods: A total of 41 hypertensive patients who were diagnosed with IHA and underwent SAAE at the Fuwai Hospital b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These articles were excluded for the following reasons: case report ( n = 6), conference abstracts ( n = 4), and overlapping data ( n = 5). Ultimately, five studies comprising 234 PA patients were included in this meta-analysis [ 10 , 11 , 16 18 ] (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These articles were excluded for the following reasons: case report ( n = 6), conference abstracts ( n = 4), and overlapping data ( n = 5). Ultimately, five studies comprising 234 PA patients were included in this meta-analysis [ 10 , 11 , 16 18 ] (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies [ 11 , 17 , 18 ] used the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) [ 19 ] as the criterion for clinical success and biochemical success, which included complete and partial success. The remaining two studies [ 10 , 16 ] employed other criteria and lacked data on biochemical success. In the study by Dong, et al [ 10 ], only marked improvement was considered as clinical success because moderate improvement was regarded as no change according to other criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations