2016
DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2015.1113284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersmooth testing on the sphere over analytic classes

Abstract: We consider the nonparametric goodness-of-fit test of the uniform density on the sphere when we have observations whose density is the convolution of an error density and the true underlying density. We will deal specifically with the supersmooth error case which includes the Gaussian distribution. Similar to deconvolution density estimation, the smoother the error density the harder is the rate recovery of the test problem. When considering nonparametric alternatives expressed over analytic classes, we show t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, the problem of testing uniformity over the unit sphere is primarily of a nonparametric nature. Even if the distributional framework described in Section 2 is considered, it is therefore valid to adopt a nonparametric point of view and to try to identify, e.g., minimax separation rates; see, e.g., Ingster (2000) or, in a directional context, Faÿ et al (2013), Lacour and Ngoc (2014) and Kim, Koo and Ngoc (2016). This approach is fundamentally different from the semiparametric one adopted in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Now, the problem of testing uniformity over the unit sphere is primarily of a nonparametric nature. Even if the distributional framework described in Section 2 is considered, it is therefore valid to adopt a nonparametric point of view and to try to identify, e.g., minimax separation rates; see, e.g., Ingster (2000) or, in a directional context, Faÿ et al (2013), Lacour and Ngoc (2014) and Kim, Koo and Ngoc (2016). This approach is fundamentally different from the semiparametric one adopted in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tests for uniformity on S d include that of Faÿ et al (2013), based on needlets (see Sect. 7.1.2), and those of Lacour and Pham Ngoc (2014) and Kim et al (2016) for "noisy" data on S 2 , i.e. where the density of the observations is a convolution of an error pdf with a true underlying pdf.…”
Section: Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent non-Sobolev tests for circular uniformity include the four-point Cramér-von Mises test of Feltz and Goldin (2001), the likelihood-ratio test (LRT) against a mixture with symmetric wrapped stable and CU components of SenGupta and Pal (2001), and the spacings-based Gini mean difference test of Tung and Jammalamadaka (2013). Tests for uniformity on S d include that of Faÿ et al (2013), based on needlets (see Section 7.1.2), and those of Lacour and Pham Ngoc (2014) and Kim et al (2016) for noisy data on S 2 . Cuesta-Albertos et al ( 2009…”
Section: Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%