Supervisor style as a predictor of counseling supervision relationship quality and supervisee satisfaction: perceptions of U.S. and South Korean supervisees

An, Ha Yan; Goodyear, Rodney K.; Seo, Young Seok; Garrison, Yunkyoung Loh; Baek, Keun Young; Cho, Hwa Jin

doi:10.1007/s12564-020-09637-x

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is a still-new domain of inquiry and therefore (see Holloway & Hosford, 1983), the study was descriptive, employing a qualitative design. Consistent with findings of cross-national studies comparing Korean and U.S. supervision An et al, 2020), it was grounded in the assumption that whereas there would be supervision elements or conditions specific to a Korean context there also would be findings that would apply to supervision regardless of national context. Forshaw et al (2019) were able to locate only six studies that examined supervisors' experience of supervision.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Unsatisfactory Supervisory Experiences Reported by South Korean Supervisors: Types, Responses, and Cultural Context

Bang

Goodyear

2021

J Contemp Psychother

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eleven Korean supervisors were interviewed about their unsatisfactory supervisory experiences (USEs) and the interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. These results were presented within a broader framework that considered the cultural context in which the supervision was occurring and its effects on relationship dynamics, as well as the supervisory context in which those supervisors were working. Supervisors reported a range of USEs, including supervisee's failure to learn and supervisees' negative reactions to the supervisors as well as coping strategies they employed in response (e.g., suppressing negative emotions and continuing supervision). Most USEs were unresolved and the supervisors came to provide rigorous structuring as well as screening potential supervisees who might bring USEs. The results are discussed in the context and current status of clinical supervision in Korea and implications of these findings for supervision, training and research in the world.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Unsatisfactory Supervisory Experiences Reported by South Korean Supervisors: Types, Responses, and Cultural Context

Bang

Goodyear

2021

J Contemp Psychother

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similarly, comparative research conducted between South Korea and the US also highlighted similarities in counsellor education but differences in supervision duration and frequency (Son et al, 2013). Moreover, certain relationships such as supervisory working alliance, supervisee nondisclosures, supervisee satisfaction, and supervisory styles showed significant associations among participants from both countries, with higher correlations in the U.S. sample (An et al, 2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Supervision practices in school counsellor education: A comparison across two countries

Yöntem,

Aydogan,

Sarıkaya

2023

Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supervision is an essential part of school counsellor education training, particularly during internship and practicum experiences, as it plays a crucial role in assisting counsellor trainees in adapting to their new roles and identities. While essential to the profession, supervision literature lacks comparison studies across countries, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of whether, and to what extent, supervision is being effectively practised cross-nationally. In the current study, authors utilized a multisite analytic approach as a form of case study method to investigate similarities and differences in counsellor educators’ school counselling supervision practices in the US and Türkiye. The study sample included a total of four counsellor education programmes, consisting of two programmes from each country. The results indicated that while counsellor educators in the US pay more attention to crisis management, suicide assessment, feedback acceptance, multicultural issues, school counsellor self-care, and mindfulness, their counterparts in Türkiye focus on creating counselling goals, counselling micro-skills, theories, and techniques. The results also provided further support for an independent counsellor education accreditation body that could oversee the supervision practices across counsellor education programmes in Türkiye for a united counsellor training, supervision, and professional counsellor identity.

show abstract

“…to imply that the transmission of clinical expertise, supervision processes, the role of the supervisor, and the underlying values are identical from one country to another. The few cross-national studies of supervision (e.g., An et al, 2020;Ellis et al, 2015;Son & Ellis, 2013) suggest that if it were possible to create a Venn diagram that represented clinical supervision worldwide and in which each circle depicted supervision practices in a particular country, there would be some area at the center in which all the circles overlapped: an area that depicts the practices common across all countries. But this hypothetical diagram also would show that because of country-specific laws and policies, professional traditions, and culture a portion of each of the circles would stand alone or would overlap with only a subset of other circles.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For clinical supervision to become more "robustly international" (Watkins, 2014, p. 251) will require betweencountry studies that are open to recognizing cultural factors that define practice in order to provide the field with a more fully informed, comprehensive, and differentiated picture of supervision. So far, cross-national studies of supervision all have (a) used the perspective of supervisees, (b) to examine specific supervision processes, (c) through U.S. centric lenses by comparing what occurs in the U.S. to what occurs in one other country (e.g., An et al, 2020;Ellis et al, 2015;Son & Ellis, 2013). No comprehensive study has employed the perspective of people who are authorities on supervision in those respective countries to look at processes of supervision at the more molar level of policies and practices across multiple nations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lens on International Clinical Supervision: Lessons Learned from a Cross-National Comparison of Supervision

Falender

Goodyear

Duan

et al. 2021

J Contemp Psychother

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical supervision is an essential mechanism for training psychologists internationally. But although it is performed globally, scholarship has primarily addressed it through the lens of Western supervision practices. The authors of this manuscript aspired to an alternative lens, that of enlightened globalization (Kim and Park in Korea J 44(2):30-51, 2007), to compare supervision practices in the U.S. and six countries that have been less studied-

show abstract

Supervisor style as a predictor of counseling supervision relationship quality and supervisee satisfaction: perceptions of U.S. and South Korean supervisees

Cited by 8 publications

References 64 publications

Unsatisfactory Supervisory Experiences Reported by South Korean Supervisors: Types, Responses, and Cultural Context

Unsatisfactory Supervisory Experiences Reported by South Korean Supervisors: Types, Responses, and Cultural Context

Supervision practices in school counsellor education: A comparison across two countries

Lens on International Clinical Supervision: Lessons Learned from a Cross-National Comparison of Supervision

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About