2014
DOI: 10.1504/jgba.2014.063866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervisory behaviour and employee work engagement: interpersonal and institutional trust as mediator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Schaufeli et al (2002), vigour is the high level of energy and mental resilience at work; dedication is the sense of enthusiasm, inspiration and pride in one's work, and absorption is being highly concentrated and happily engrossed in work. From research, supervisors' behaviours influence employees' engagement (Ahamed and Hassan, 2014;Li et al, 2018). Other scholarly reviews report a positive relationship between positive leadership styles such as Effects of leaders' abusive supervision transformation and ethical leadership styles on work engagement (Carasco-Saul et al, 2015;Decuypere and Schaufeli, 2020).…”
Section: Effect Of Abusive Supervision On Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schaufeli et al (2002), vigour is the high level of energy and mental resilience at work; dedication is the sense of enthusiasm, inspiration and pride in one's work, and absorption is being highly concentrated and happily engrossed in work. From research, supervisors' behaviours influence employees' engagement (Ahamed and Hassan, 2014;Li et al, 2018). Other scholarly reviews report a positive relationship between positive leadership styles such as Effects of leaders' abusive supervision transformation and ethical leadership styles on work engagement (Carasco-Saul et al, 2015;Decuypere and Schaufeli, 2020).…”
Section: Effect Of Abusive Supervision On Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The job demands‐resources model (JD‐R) (Bakker & Demerouti, ), derived from the lens of conservation of resource (COR) theory (Hobfell, 1989), revealed that resources, either work‐related or personal resources, are a key ingredient in encouraging and developing work engagement among employees. Work‐related resources include leadership, social support, autonomy, and job control (Ahamed & Hassan, ; Ahamed, Hassan, & Hashim, ; Bae, Song, Park, & Kim, ; Biggs, Brough, & Barbour, ; De Clercq, Bouckenooghe, Raja, & Matsyborska, ; Fujimoto, Ferdous, Sekiguchi, & Sugianto, ; Othman & Nasurdin, ; Poon, ; Schmitt, Den Hartog, & Belschak, ; Van Wingerden et al, ). Personal resources comprise psychological capital, self‐efficacy, hope, self‐esteem, and emotional intelligence (Boamah & Laschinger, ; Consiglio, Borgogni, Di Tecco, & Schaufeli, ; Karatepe, ; Mauno, Kinnunen, & Ruokolainen, ; Van Wingerden et al, ; Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, , 2009; Zhu, Liu, Guo, Zhao, & Lou, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%