2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplier selection and order allocation decisions under quantity discount and fast service options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Wu et al (2019a) presented an MCDM based on IT2FAHP in order to optimize renewable energy projects from the perspective of sustainability. Alegoz and Yapicioglu (2019) proposed a MCDM method with IT2FAHP, using TOPSIS and goal programming for supplier selection. In addition to these articles, studies on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have also been conducted ( Bravo-Mosquera et al, 2019 ; Bravo-Mosquera et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Wu et al (2019a) presented an MCDM based on IT2FAHP in order to optimize renewable energy projects from the perspective of sustainability. Alegoz and Yapicioglu (2019) proposed a MCDM method with IT2FAHP, using TOPSIS and goal programming for supplier selection. In addition to these articles, studies on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have also been conducted ( Bravo-Mosquera et al, 2019 ; Bravo-Mosquera et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offering quantity discount is an important feature in the selection of the best suppliers. Therefore, each company can achieve low cost while allocating large volume orders to the suppliers (Alegoz and Yapicioglu 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duan and Ventura [12] formulated a multiperiod mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model with single product and multisupplier; meanwhile, lead time and order frequency are took into account in the model. Alegoz and Yapicioglu [13] used TOPSIS and AHP to determine the weights of different objectives.…”
Section: Order Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%