Supply and Demand Analysis, Future Demand Forecast, and Countermeasure Studies for Forage Materials in China

Liu, Aimin; Jia, Ping; Wang, Lixin; Wu, Liangjie

doi:10.15302/j-sscae-2018.05.006

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Expanding of population accelerates the consumption of livestock products, resulting in the growing demand for forage, which brings unprecedented challenges to agriculture and natural resources (Sun et al., 2014). The demand for forage has been increasing and 48 million t of high‐quality forage is needed for livestock by 2035 in China as predicted (Liu et al., 2018). The agro–pastoral ecotone of northeastern China is one of the major grain and forage producing areas (Xin et al., 2020) and has faced the dilemma of forage shortage in recent years (Ma and Ma, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sowing ratio determines forage yields and economic benefits of oat and common vetch intercropping

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mixtures of annual legumes with cereal grasses in forage production are considered to have great advantages and are extensively used in the agro-pastoral region of China.However, the effect of sowing ratio on forage yields and economic benefits of oat (Avena sativa L.) and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) intercropping remains largely unknown. A 2 yr field experiment was conducted with seven sowing ratios (sowing ratio of oat as 0, 25, 33, 50, 67, 75, and 100%) for oat and common vetch intercropping in northeastern China. Intercropping showed significant advantages in forage yield, land equivalent ratio (LER), and net income in the 2 yr. Oat was the dominant partner in the mixtures, strongly outcompeting common vetch. A sowing ratio of oat at 50% produced the highest forage yields of 10.8-11.1 t ha -1 in spring seeding and 4.9-7.7 t ha -1 in summer seeding, which were 28.7-66.4% and 12.6-166.9% higher than those in monocultures, respectively, if we considered two years together. In any case, oat forage yield just slightly decreased with a decreasing share in the intercrops, whereas common vetch forage yields strongly decreased. The highest LERs were detected in a sowing ratio of oat at 50%, which was 11-57% higher than other sowing ratios. Similarly, the highest annual net incomes of US$1,336 and $1,088 ha -1 were also obtained in a sowing ratio of oat at 50% in the 2 yr. In conclusion, oat and common vetch intercropping have greater forage yields and economic benefits compared with the corresponding monocultures in the agro-pastoral region of China, and a sowing ratio of oat at 50% is recommended.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sowing ratio determines forage yields and economic benefits of oat and common vetch intercropping

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a bulk animal product, milk has gained extensive attention for its yield and quality. "Grass-raising livestock" has become a powerful guarantee for current high-quality dairy products [1,2]. As the primary feed source for livestock breeding, the quality of grass forage is the focus of safety supervision.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi‐residue analysis of 206 pesticides in grass forage by the one‐step quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method combined with ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometry

Feng³

et al. 2022

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A novel method for detecting pesticide multi‐residue in grass forage (alfalfa and oat) was established based on the one‐step automatic extraction and purification technology of quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe combined with ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography quadrupole Orbitrap high‐resolution mass spectrometry. The crushed sample was extracted with acetonitrile with 1% acetate, followed by a cleanup step with a primary‐secondary amine, octadecylsilane, and graphitized carbon black. The extraction and purification were carried out using the one‐step automatic pretreatment equipment. The target pesticides were acquired in positive ion electrospray ionization mode and full scan/data dependent secondary scan mode. The calibration curve shows good linearity over the corresponding concentration range, with the coefficient of determination greater than 0.99. The screening detection limits were 0.5–50 μg/kg, and the limit of quantification for the 206 pesticides was set at 1–50 μg/kg. At the spiking levels of one, two, and 10 times of limit of quantification, more than 95% of pesticides had recovery between 70–120%, with a relative standard deviation ≤20%. The method was proved to be simple, rapid, high‐sensitivity, and could be routinely used for the high throughput screening and quantitative analysis of pesticide residues in alfalfa and oat.

show abstract

Antineoplastic Effects and Mechanisms of a New RGD Chimeric Peptide from Bullfrog Skin on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of B16F10 Cells

Jiang

Zhang

et al. 2021

Protein J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supply and Demand Analysis, Future Demand Forecast, and Countermeasure Studies for Forage Materials in China

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Sowing ratio determines forage yields and economic benefits of oat and common vetch intercropping

Sowing ratio determines forage yields and economic benefits of oat and common vetch intercropping

Multi‐residue analysis of 206 pesticides in grass forage by the one‐step quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method combined with ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometry

Antineoplastic Effects and Mechanisms of a New RGD Chimeric Peptide from Bullfrog Skin on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of B16F10 Cells

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About