Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies

Abstract

Purpose -Though there is a wide acceptance of the strategic importance of integrating operations with suppliers and customers in the supply chain, many questions remain unanswered about how best to characterize supply chain strategies. Is it more important to link with suppliers, customers, or both? Similarly, little is known about the connections between supplier and customer integration and improved operations performance. This article seeks to investigate supplier and customer integration strategies by comparing US and East Asian companies. It is of paramount interest to find out how these strategies actually differ and affect performance of the companies. Design/methodology/approach -This was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, a number of operations-management related journals were skimmed to select about 30 research articles related to supply chain concepts and practices. In the second phase, investigation efforts narrowed down to supply chain management research conducted in East Asia and the USA. In the third phase, comparisons were made between East Asian and US companies' indicators of supply chain integration and performance. Findings -The need to react to market changes and the critical role of the supply chain in meeting this need, and the potential benefits of integrating the supply chain, can no longer be ignored. This potential, however, will be realized only if the interrelationships among different parts of the supply chain are recognized, and proper alignment is ensured between the design and execution of the company's competitive strategy. Practical implications -The implications for article findings on future research and practice in the new millennium are considered. Originality/value -The aim is to recommend these findings to companies which are still at the infancy stage when it comes to supply chain management and integration with customers and suppliers.

The Effect of Absorptive Capacity on Green Customer Capital under an Organizational Unlearning Context

“…This finding contributes to shed light and empirically validate Leal-Rodríguez et al [33] and Larrañeta and Galan's [59] claim that both ACAP dimensions contribute to firm performance. This finding also supports Zailani and Rajagopal's [110] and Zhou and Benton's [111] proposition that good relationships with customers and effective information sharing with customers and suppliers are now crucial for enhancing performance. The effect of ACAP on GCC was observed to strengthen when OU was greater.…”

Supply Chain Management Dimensions, Supply Chain Performance and Organizational Performance: An Integrated Framework

“…As mentioned by Emberson, Storey, Godsell and Harrison (2006), the challenge for supply chain management lies in understanding the interplay and alignment of different units of the supply chain. In addition, the potential of the supply chain can only be realized if the potential linkages between different components of the supply chain are understood (Burgess et al 2006;Min & Mentzer, 2004;S.Li et al, 2005S.Li et al, , 2006Zailani & Rajagopal, 2005). As indicated before researchers have tried to understand the broad construct of supply chain management.…”

Managing supply chain integration: contemporary approaches and scope for further research

“…There is growing evidence linking SCI to perfor-mance improvement (Zailani and Rajagopal 2005). The importance of SCI for performance enhancement is emphasised by academics who have studied manu-facturing companies in different countries (Kim 2006, Mahama 2006, Welker et al 2008, Wong and Boon-Itt 2008, Kim 2009, Jayaram et al 2011.…”