2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Vector Machine in Precision Agriculture: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e calculation of mean average precision (mAP) depends on AP, where AP is defined as the intersection over union (IoU) threshold value of 0.5; for a class with N correctly identified samples, each correctly identified sample will correspond to a P b value, and the average of the N P b is taken to obtain the average accuracy of the class; see (10). mAP (IoU > 0.5) is defined as the mean value under all categories of AP, as shown in (11); this study has healthy leaves, early blight, and late blight. As the total number of detection categories, Q is 3, and mAP is the average cumulative value of the average accuracy of multicategory, which can overall demonstrate the comprehensive performance of the model.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e calculation of mean average precision (mAP) depends on AP, where AP is defined as the intersection over union (IoU) threshold value of 0.5; for a class with N correctly identified samples, each correctly identified sample will correspond to a P b value, and the average of the N P b is taken to obtain the average accuracy of the class; see (10). mAP (IoU > 0.5) is defined as the mean value under all categories of AP, as shown in (11); this study has healthy leaves, early blight, and late blight. As the total number of detection categories, Q is 3, and mAP is the average cumulative value of the average accuracy of multicategory, which can overall demonstrate the comprehensive performance of the model.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In disease identification under natural conditions, traditional computer vision feature extraction is used as a critical technical link to extract colour, texture, and shape features by HSV colour space combined with support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) for disease identification. However, the diversity and complexity of leaf spots under actual conditions and the susceptibility of the features to light conditions, especially the poor stability of the colour features, make this method unsatisfactory for identification [9][10][11]. Compared with traditional methods, convolutional neural networks (CNN) are rapidly developing, and new types of models are emerging with more substantial expressive power in feature extraction [12,13], and VGG19, AlexNet, SqueezeNet, InceptionV3, Faster R-CNN, and ResNet50 have achieved better results in disease image detection and classification [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector machine (SVM) modelling was also considered for use in this study but was discarded due to the improved interpretability of relationships formed within RF models. SVM models have often performed similarly to RF models (see review 70 ), but lack outputs that enable transparent interpretation of relationships formed within the model [71][72][73] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[62]. SVRs have been used for regression applications in agriculture [63][64][65][66]. Unlike the other CI models discussed earlier, SVRs do not have any strong parallels in nature.…”
Section: Support Vector Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%