2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0774-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support vector regression for determining the minimum zone sphericity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the drawback is that several runs should be made to ensure a global optimum. In recent years intelligent evaluation has being focused on in many countries [6][7][8][9]. To some extent, the method has solved drawbacks of traditional evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the drawback is that several runs should be made to ensure a global optimum. In recent years intelligent evaluation has being focused on in many countries [6][7][8][9]. To some extent, the method has solved drawbacks of traditional evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Hilbert-Schmidt principle [29], the inner product operation in the original linear case can be replaced by φ i (x) • φ j (x). The decision function becomes as shown in equation ( 8):…”
Section: Twin Support Vector Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of sampling points is a key factor in determining the accuracy of flatness evaluation, excessive sampling points are the guarantee of detection accuracy [14]. For a large number of detection data, experts have proposed a variety of optimization algorithms for flatness evaluation, such as a support vector regression method [15], vectorial method [16] and a hybrid method based on reduced constraint region and convex-hull edge [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%