2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supported β-Mo2C on Carbon Materials for Kraft Lignin Decomposition into Aromatic Monomers in Ethanol

Abstract: The β-Mo 2 C on different carbon supports was prepared conveniently via direct H 2 reduction or self-reduction for catalytic conversion of Kraft lignin into aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic alcohols, and aromatic aldehydes. The β-Mo 2 C on macroporous carbon (MC) with large pore size exhibits the highest activity with aromatic yield of 0.543 g/g Kraft lignin at 280 °C for 3 h, resulting from the accessibility of lignin fragments to β-Mo 2 C. Mo, MoO 2 , and MoO 3 possess relatively low activity. Higher calcinat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aromatic components are classified as aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic alcohols, and aromatic aldehydes, which are produced from C−C and C−O scissions of lignin. Our previous work 39 showed that the yields of aromatic monomers (0.022 g/g Kraft lignin) without any catalyst are significantly lower than that in Figure 7, which confirms the benefit of MoC catalysts for the conversion of Kraft lignin to aromatic monomers. The esters are mainly produced via esterification of solvent ethanol and oxygenated compounds (such as alcohols, aldehydes, and acids from linkages and acid branches of lignin) with the hydrogen radical involved, and the long carbon-chain esters are highly related to aldol condensation of intermediate aldehydes.…”
Section: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Researchsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The aromatic components are classified as aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic alcohols, and aromatic aldehydes, which are produced from C−C and C−O scissions of lignin. Our previous work 39 showed that the yields of aromatic monomers (0.022 g/g Kraft lignin) without any catalyst are significantly lower than that in Figure 7, which confirms the benefit of MoC catalysts for the conversion of Kraft lignin to aromatic monomers. The esters are mainly produced via esterification of solvent ethanol and oxygenated compounds (such as alcohols, aldehydes, and acids from linkages and acid branches of lignin) with the hydrogen radical involved, and the long carbon-chain esters are highly related to aldol condensation of intermediate aldehydes.…”
Section: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Researchsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Compared to the higher yields of esters and alcohols from the depolymerization of Kraft lignin over a conventional Mo 2 C catalyst, the main products identified here are C 6 –C 11 monophenols such as sinapyl, coniferyl, p -coumaryl alcohols, and their derivatives. Moreover, the overall yield of the mono-oxygenated phenolics detected by GC is 10.1 wt %, based on the weight of the enzymatic hydrolysis lignin loaded into the reactor, which is much higher than that obtained from the one-pot lignin depolymerization over Mo 2 C catalysts having been reported so far, as shown in Figure b. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…When the reaction of an enzymatic hydrolysis lignin sample obtained from corncob with a weight-average molecular weight (M w ) of 10,650 was carried out at the optimized reaction conditions (Figures S13 and S14), that is, 300 °C and 9.6 MPa for 4 h, over N-Mo 2 C@C-700, the maximum yield of the liquid products was 93.5% with a M w of 573 and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.57, much lower than that obtained over hydrogenation catalysts, confirming that the lignin depolymerization is well performed in this process (Figure S15). 44,45 Also, some chemicals with m/z of 300−900 were also detected by LC-MS (Figures S16−20). The total-ion chromatogram (TIC) derived from a gas chromatography− mass spectrometry (GC−MS) is shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations