2007
DOI: 10.1080/16823200709487183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting academic staff as champions of service learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 2008 :58), pervasive conceptual confusion (Bender 2008 :82) and a scarceness of conceptual frameworks to concretise community engagement activities ( Hall 2010 :24). The pivotal role that academics play in successful SL institutionalisation (Bender 2007 ; Bringle & Hatcher 1996 ; Erasmus 2007 ; Furco 2002b ) is affirmed by the mandate given to HEIs. The South African SL policy documents, published by the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC), obliged HEIs to provide the necessary institutional support for academics to become involved in and develop SL (Bender et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2008 :58), pervasive conceptual confusion (Bender 2008 :82) and a scarceness of conceptual frameworks to concretise community engagement activities ( Hall 2010 :24). The pivotal role that academics play in successful SL institutionalisation (Bender 2007 ; Bringle & Hatcher 1996 ; Erasmus 2007 ; Furco 2002b ) is affirmed by the mandate given to HEIs. The South African SL policy documents, published by the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC), obliged HEIs to provide the necessary institutional support for academics to become involved in and develop SL (Bender et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service-learning (SL) is a relatively new field in the social and educational landscapes (HEQC 2006b :138; Le Grange 2007 :3). Butin’s ( 2006a :1) claim that SL is actively supported by governments because of the inherent potential that SL has to contribute to the societal transformation agendas of governments is confirmed by other scholars (Bender 2008 :84; Erasmus 2007 :110; Weerts & Sandman 2010:632–633). SL scholars and practitioners, however, have raised concerns about SL issues related to sustainability (Brukardt et al 2004 :4), transformative practice (Butin 2006b :478) and authentic institutional commitment (Brukardt et al 2004 :17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Julie ( 2014a :37) agrees with Erasmus ( 2007 :110) that some of the institutional indicators of the framework are ambiguously phrased, specifically indicators 4 and 7. The institutional input indicator 4 refers to ‘adequate resource allocation for delivering quality SL as part of the institution's [ sic ] core functions’ (HEQC 2006a :38).…”
Section: The South African Service-learning Good Practice Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is acknowledged that higher education institutions in South Africa, as in many countries all over the world, have actively taken up the challenge of becoming more engaged with local constituencies and more responsive to the challenges faced by the various communities with which they interact. Those working in the field of higher education community engagement tend to experience obstacles and limited support that seem out of proportion with the emphasis that is placed on this third core function as a transformative mechanism (Erasmus 2007b). In the context of this book parallels may well be drawn with the precarious situation that organisations of the non-profit/civil society/third sector in South Africa find themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%