Supporting Accountability in the Field of Mediation

Abstract

Over time, many fields of work—law, medicine, and teaching—matured from informal bodies of knowledge and skills, passed from one practitioner to another, into professions. In the process each began enumerating and affirming their intellectual and practical roots. Each also began testing practitioners to insure comprehension of relevant knowledge and an ability to demonstrate relevant skills. Family mediators in Canada have moved in this direction. In the United States, people who mediate interpersonal disputes also feel pressured to take additional steps to assure the quality of our work. This article summarizes what mediation organizations in the United States have done and could do to vouch for work in our field. But, taking additional steps calls for a clearer understanding of what a mediator should know and what they are expected to do. These two critical pieces of information remain nebulous. So, this article goes beyond describing ways of insuring accountability by also describing a recently completed job analysis, a tool frequently used in other fields of work to describe the skills and knowledge relevant to a particular job.

Community Mediation – Choosing a Direction

“…relates to what has made or what will make it an effective method of dispute resolution (Herrman et al, 2002). Although there are challenges to the limiting nature of this discourse in that it seems to reduce mediation to a simple settlement based or solution-focused process, the debate continues as to its potential (Pinzon, 1996;Bush & Folger, 2005;Charcoudian & Billick, 2015).…”