“…Additionally, when asked which abstraction technique they used from a list developed from the literature review, including functional decomposition [28,[30][31][32], the function-means tree [33], C-K modelling [34,35], checklist of key questions [36], the 'abstracting design principles' step of Biomimicry Thinking [10], causal relationship template [37], structure-behaviour-function [38], what-why-how template [39], SR.BID or the Four Box Method [40], DANE structured descriptions [41], the SAPPhIRE model of causality [42], and BioTRIZ [66], my own process of analysis and interpretation, none of the above, and other, 75% (n = 43) of those that used physical models also reported that they use 'my own process', a statistically significant correlation, X 2 (12) = 8.876, p = 0.003, Cramer's V = 0.181. Additional significant correlations between the use of physical models and 'checklist of key questions' and 'structure-function-behavior' as abstraction techniques were found, though with less prevalence.…”