Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications 2015
DOI: 10.5220/0005268000170028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Event-based Geospatial Anomaly Detection with Geovisual Analytics

Abstract: Collecting multiple geospatial datasets that describe the same real-world events can be useful in monitoring and enforcement situations (e.g., independently tracking where a fishing vessel travelled and where it reported to have fished). While finding the obvious anomalies between such datasets may be a simple task, discovering more subtle inconsistencies can be challenging when the datasets describe many events that cover large geographic and temporal ranges. This paper presents a geovisual analytics approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VEMEA automates the menial aspects of anomaly detection, allowing the analyst to consider, examine, and explore among a much larger number of potential anomalies than with the existing methods. Previously, we have outlined VEMEA’s core features and presented evidence of its value; 7 this article provides a more detailed explanation of the system, two case studies showing how the system can be used to support the confirmation of suspected or known movement-event anomalies (RQ2) and the isolation of unknown movement-event anomalies (RQ3) and a comprehensive analysis of expert data analysts’ field trial evaluations of VEMEA, which focus on the usefulness (RQ4) and ease of use (RQ5) of the approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEMEA automates the menial aspects of anomaly detection, allowing the analyst to consider, examine, and explore among a much larger number of potential anomalies than with the existing methods. Previously, we have outlined VEMEA’s core features and presented evidence of its value; 7 this article provides a more detailed explanation of the system, two case studies showing how the system can be used to support the confirmation of suspected or known movement-event anomalies (RQ2) and the isolation of unknown movement-event anomalies (RQ3) and a comprehensive analysis of expert data analysts’ field trial evaluations of VEMEA, which focus on the usefulness (RQ4) and ease of use (RQ5) of the approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%