Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing 2017
DOI: 10.1145/2998181.2998276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Patient-Provider Collaboration to Identify Individual Triggers using Food and Symptom Journals

Abstract: Patient-generated data can allow patients and providers to collaboratively develop accurate diagnoses and actionable treatment plans. Unfortunately, patients and providers often lack effective support to make use of such data. We examine patient-provider collaboration to interpret patient-generated data. We focus on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a chronic illness in which particular foods can exacerbate symptoms. IBS management often requires patient-provider collaboration using a patient's food and symptom … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients and clinicians may also approach the analysis of data in different ways [32]. However, successful collaboration can be very rewarding: with the proper tools, discussing tracked data with clinician experts can increase patients’ understanding of their health data, lead to more productive reflection, improve the clinician-patient relationship, and ultimately increase patients’ ability to self-manage [34,44,48]. Clinicians and patients can collaborate over data to jointly interpret it in and engage in shared decision-making [37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients and clinicians may also approach the analysis of data in different ways [32]. However, successful collaboration can be very rewarding: with the proper tools, discussing tracked data with clinician experts can increase patients’ understanding of their health data, lead to more productive reflection, improve the clinician-patient relationship, and ultimately increase patients’ ability to self-manage [34,44,48]. Clinicians and patients can collaborate over data to jointly interpret it in and engage in shared decision-making [37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chung et al suggest that tracking tools be designed to more flexibly support collaboration and provide better visualizations [8], while West et al suggest that tracking tools make it easier for clinicians to reason about the data they collect [55]. Schroeder et al suggest that tools support exploration through flexibility and simplicity, and emphasize the generation of actionable insights [48]. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, advances in information technology enable people to use various technological tools for tracking their condition, but limited evidence supports the efficacy of using these newer tools to accomplish successful management [20]. Barriers to successful self-tracking identified in prior research include: (1) insufficient support for patient-or tracker-provider collaboration [21], (2) lapses in use of tracking tools due to barriers in making sense of accumulated data [22], and (3) difficulty in remembering to track or deciding what to track [23].…”
Section: Self-trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an in-depth discussion of coordinated reflection using one tool, in one disease context, see Schroeder et al [21] for a description of person and healthcare provider collaboration in the context of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.…”
Section: The Pharmacist Got Involved In My Cholesterol Medication Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173743 Previous research on pain logging has focused on the use of diaries that allow patients to engage in self-scoring of their experienced pain. Such diaries are intended to be used away from the clinic, as a journal which can later support discussions between patients and clinicians [24,34]. However, in the context of monitoring patient pain during hospital stays, the standard clinical practice is for nurses to collect subjective pain data from patients [7,8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%