2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24641-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Searching on Small Screen Devices Using Summarisation

Abstract: In recent years, small screen devices have seen widespread increase in their acceptance and use. Combining mobility with their increased technological advances many such devices can now be considered mobile information terminals. However, user interactions with small screen devices remain a challenge due to the inherent limited display capabilities. These challenges are particularly evident for tasks, such as information seeking. In this paper we assess the effectiveness of using hierarchical-query biased summ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of using previously defined relevance assessments are that we can identify for what types of relevant documents the system is performing poorly, that we can perform some error checking as was done in the interactive track of TREC, and we can define alternative evaluation measures, e.g. Sweeney and Crestani (2003) used decision correctness: the proportion of relevant and non-relevant documents correctly identified, a measure that is only possible when using ground truth test collections.…”
Section: Relevance and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The advantages of using previously defined relevance assessments are that we can identify for what types of relevant documents the system is performing poorly, that we can perform some error checking as was done in the interactive track of TREC, and we can define alternative evaluation measures, e.g. Sweeney and Crestani (2003) used decision correctness: the proportion of relevant and non-relevant documents correctly identified, a measure that is only possible when using ground truth test collections.…”
Section: Relevance and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By adopting a strategy to detect novelty in the generation of summaries, we aim to reduce the amount of redundant information contained in subsequent summaries. In previous studies, we have investigated the use of hierarchical query-biased summarisation using summaries of increasing length on a mobile phone (Sweeney, Crestani, & Tombros, 2002) and a PDA (Sweeney & Crestani, 2003). In those studies our assumption of 'show me more' was simply as providing a summary of increasing length.…”
Section: 'Show Me More'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sweeney et al (2002;Sweeney & Crestani, 2003), investigate the use of automatically-generated hierarchical query-biased text summaries of newspaper articles presented to on WAP mobile phones, and PDAs. They describe hierarchical text summaries as having a root, or top level summary, which corresponds to the minimum level of information; each hierachy, or summary level, is then intended to provide more information.…”
Section: Information Access In Non-traditional Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some attempts to calculate the optimal size of the document's summary. Sweeny (Sweeney 2003) has mentioned some static percentage to generate an adapted document. For example he suggests that a summary of 3% is the most optimal value for the mobile phones (without considering the size of the document!).…”
Section: Summary's Size Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%