2008
DOI: 10.1177/0969733007083937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Sexual Activity in Long-Term Care

Abstract: Although nurses in almost every long-term care facility face daily challenges involving issues related to residents' sexual lives, guidelines for ethically supporting sexual activity are rare and inadequate. A decision-making framework was developed to guide care providers in responding to the sexual expression of residents in long-term care. The framework recommends that nurses should weigh the documented substantial benefits of having a sexual life against harm to the resident and others, and against offence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, non‐pharmacological strategies (e.g., providing relevant information that will help the resident to reduce potential harms, encouraging the resident to take appropriate precautions, bringing the resident to a private room) should always be prioritised (Joller et al., ; Ozkan et al., ; Tucker, ), and pharmacological and physical restraint should be limited to only crisis situations when inappropriate sexual behaviours constitute a risk for the staff or the other residents (Bauer, Fetherstonhaugh, Tarzia, Nay, & Beattie, ; Everett, ). To this regard, Everett () offers a valuable tool to understand when the interference with patients’ wishes and behaviours is permissible. Based on Everett's framework, interference is only permissible when it is “ effective, it does not create a greater harm than it prevents, it is the mildest possible, it is not discriminatory, and thought justifiable by those upon whom it is imposed ” (Everett, , appendix 2, p. 96).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, non‐pharmacological strategies (e.g., providing relevant information that will help the resident to reduce potential harms, encouraging the resident to take appropriate precautions, bringing the resident to a private room) should always be prioritised (Joller et al., ; Ozkan et al., ; Tucker, ), and pharmacological and physical restraint should be limited to only crisis situations when inappropriate sexual behaviours constitute a risk for the staff or the other residents (Bauer, Fetherstonhaugh, Tarzia, Nay, & Beattie, ; Everett, ). To this regard, Everett () offers a valuable tool to understand when the interference with patients’ wishes and behaviours is permissible. Based on Everett's framework, interference is only permissible when it is “ effective, it does not create a greater harm than it prevents, it is the mildest possible, it is not discriminatory, and thought justifiable by those upon whom it is imposed ” (Everett, , appendix 2, p. 96).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 However, when the capacity of one or both of the people involved is called into question (and it should be noted that assessment of capacity is not always straightforward 68,69 and can easily be underestimated in people with dementia 38 ) then balancing rights to sexual expression with risks of sexual abuse and exploitation is often challenging. Care homes have a duty to protect their residents, but also a duty to uphold residents' rights to autonomy and respect for their private lives.…”
Section: Legal Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature exists regarding the ethics of allowing and facilitating sexual relationships in long-term care. [74][75][76][77][78][79] To effectively evaluate whether nursing home residents should be able to participate in intimate relationships, nursing home staff must assess each resident's sexual consent capacity. Several approaches for assessment of sexual activity within nursing homes have been presented in the literature, 74 based on residents' ability to perform sexual acts voluntarily and to understand the consequences of their actions.…”
Section: Ethical and Policy Concerns In Rrsamentioning
confidence: 99%