“…Therefore, non‐pharmacological strategies (e.g., providing relevant information that will help the resident to reduce potential harms, encouraging the resident to take appropriate precautions, bringing the resident to a private room) should always be prioritised (Joller et al., ; Ozkan et al., ; Tucker, ), and pharmacological and physical restraint should be limited to only crisis situations when inappropriate sexual behaviours constitute a risk for the staff or the other residents (Bauer, Fetherstonhaugh, Tarzia, Nay, & Beattie, ; Everett, ). To this regard, Everett () offers a valuable tool to understand when the interference with patients’ wishes and behaviours is permissible. Based on Everett's framework, interference is only permissible when it is “ effective, it does not create a greater harm than it prevents, it is the mildest possible, it is not discriminatory, and thought justifiable by those upon whom it is imposed ” (Everett, , appendix 2, p. 96).…”