2011
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2010.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression and Replacement Gene Therapy for Autosomal Dominant Disease in a Murine Model of Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa

Abstract: For dominantly inherited disorders development of gene therapies, targeting the primary genetic lesion has been impeded by mutational heterogeneity. An example is rhodopsin-linked autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa with over 150 mutations in the rhodopsin gene. Validation of a mutation-independent suppression and replacement gene therapy for this disorder has been undertaken. The therapy provides a means of correcting the genetic defect in a mutation-independent manner thereby circumventing the mutational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
121
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
121
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, significant histological and electrophysical benefit has been demonstrated in the P347S mouse model of RHOadRP by combining suppression and replacement in a single administration of two AAV2/5 vectors, one with an RNAi suppressor and the other providing a codon-modified RNAi-resistant RHO replacement gene ( Figure 2). 13 At 20 weeks post-injection, some control eyes gave vestigial rod-isolated electroretinography responses and the outer nuclear layer had almost completely disappeared. In contrast, 3-4 rows of photoreceptor nuclei remained in the outer nuclear layer of eyes treated with the dual component therapy and rod-isolated electroretinography responses of approximately 60 mV were recorded.…”
Section: Preclinical Studies Using Therapies Targeting the Primary Gementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, significant histological and electrophysical benefit has been demonstrated in the P347S mouse model of RHOadRP by combining suppression and replacement in a single administration of two AAV2/5 vectors, one with an RNAi suppressor and the other providing a codon-modified RNAi-resistant RHO replacement gene ( Figure 2). 13 At 20 weeks post-injection, some control eyes gave vestigial rod-isolated electroretinography responses and the outer nuclear layer had almost completely disappeared. In contrast, 3-4 rows of photoreceptor nuclei remained in the outer nuclear layer of eyes treated with the dual component therapy and rod-isolated electroretinography responses of approximately 60 mV were recorded.…”
Section: Preclinical Studies Using Therapies Targeting the Primary Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach involves the use of two components, suppression of both mutant and wild-type RHO alleles and provision of a suppression-resistant replacement RHO gene, engineered using codonredundancy. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In the context of dominant retinopathies, suppression and replacement is also being explored as a therapy for peripherin/ retinal degeneration slow-linked adRP, the next most common form of adRP after RHO-adRP. 15,16 In principle, replacement genes could be modified in a number of ways, for example, at degenerate sites as stated above.…”
Section: Therapies Targeted To Correcting the Primary Genetic Defect mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is an interesting approach, as promoter repression targets the locus of a gene that is present in two copies per diploid cell, as opposed to the transcript, which can be very abundant and challenging to silence, as in the case of RHO. To date, the most advanced proof of concept of the ''suppression-replacement'' strategy for dominant RHO mutations has been provided by O'Reilly et al (2008), Mao et al (2012), andMillington-Ward et al (2011), who used a single AAV2/8 vector that codelivers an shRNA directed to RHO and a silencing-resistant RHO transgene. This strategy resulted in significant delay of PR cell loss in treated RHO-P23H mice (O'Reilly et al, 2007;Mao et al, 2012) and in increased rod function (Mao et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%